Live data from Hacker News

An internal team 'hoodwinked' Bill Gates into launching the Xbox project

gamesradar.com

191–200 of 242 posts

Re: An internal team 'hoodwinked' Bill Gates into launching the Xbox project

#191
post #156

'He tells us: "Eventually somebody would come back to you with your idea – they would say, 'Hey, you know, this doesn't need Windows at all'. And you have to control your urge to fucking kill them, because you've been telling them that for two years and now they finally come up with it like it's their idea. But that's the Jedi mind trick." ' OMG. I learned this a few years ago working in a corp environment with stubb…

The way I see it, you are just a single data point to the senior people. You mention something, they hear it from a couple of other places and they are now convinced that its a good path forward. You can put your black hat and game this by making sure you suggest whatever you’re after to more people/sources of info that your target listens to. Bonus points for going through intermediaries that obscure the source of t…

I've had that exact same experience with my wife. I'd tell her something for weeks, months, years, without her buying into it at all--then I'd watch somebody at a party tell her the same thing and she suddenly agrees! It's been infuriating. But now that I look at it in this framework, I have a path forward: spread ideas to her family and friends first.

Re: An internal team 'hoodwinked' Bill Gates into launching the Xbox project

#192
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

iOS was based off NextStep, just like OSX.

Could you elaborate? I'd say any connection iOS has with NextStep is through OS X. What connection does iOS have to NextStep that is independent of OS X parentage?

I was being sarcastic, iOS is clearly based on MacOS/OSX, which was derived from NextStep. OP was implying that was a myth.

Re: An internal team 'hoodwinked' Bill Gates into launching the Xbox project

#193

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Actually it's super-easy to believe, barely an inconvenience. Wikipedia tells me 3,000 Japanese soldiers died in the Battle of Midway. [1] If I gloss over the fact that they were soldiers and not civilians, and ignore the injuries, in terms of one-day death toll, it's the same as 9/11. Sure, the Japanese military was the aggressor in WWII, but it seems rude to mention 3,000 human deaths for a cheap "take that!" I mea…

> As an optional fun fact, Midway Games was probably using the same allegory when they picked their name. Really? I always thought this was because they were founded in Chicago, near Midway airport. (The airport itself was named after the battle though). Midway games got started in video games licensing games from japanese companies Taito and Namco, so I never thought about an adversarial explaination of the name.

Yeah, there's no weight to this.

Midway started in the 60s. They weren't competing with Japanese companies back then. American arcades were filled with American pinball machines, Computer Space or Pong. Japanese games like Space Invaders and Pac Man wouldn't take off until the late 70s.

In addition to the airport being a source for the name, in the 40s, the Chicago Bears were nicknamed "Monsters of the Midway" and there is also a park known as "the Midway" in Chicago.

Re: An internal team 'hoodwinked' Bill Gates into launching the Xbox project

#194

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Actually it's super-easy to believe, barely an inconvenience. Wikipedia tells me 3,000 Japanese soldiers died in the Battle of Midway. [1] If I gloss over the fact that they were soldiers and not civilians, and ignore the injuries, in terms of one-day death toll, it's the same as 9/11. Sure, the Japanese military was the aggressor in WWII, but it seems rude to mention 3,000 human deaths for a cheap "take that!" I mea…

Most of the world doesn't think like that, and referring to a major battle the US won in what is probably the single most justified war in US history as "problematic" make you sound like a nazi. Edit: specifically the line "referring as it does to the World War II battle in which US forces defeated the Japanese."

Using such a term when your direct competitors are Japanese will evoke some mental imagery. Very, very tasteless in my humble opinion.

Re: An internal team 'hoodwinked' Bill Gates into launching the Xbox project

#195
post #125

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The problem with that is logic doesn’t provide goals, priorities or motivation to achieve them. I was thinking about this recently while watching Raised By Wolves. The Androids express feelings and emotions, but this isn’t necessarily unrealistic. That could be a useful way to encode goals and evaluate priorities.

I didn't describe my logic, so to which logic are you referring? I made some statements which I believe to be true. You're just contributing to my beliefs that humanity is entirely worthless.

I'm sorry you took offense, I didn't mean to be rude. I'm just making a point about logic in general, not "your logic" whatever you mean by that. Fundamental drives and goals are necessarily axiomatic and so cannot be derived logically. Intermediate goals yes, but not base drives and objectives.

Re: An internal team 'hoodwinked' Bill Gates into launching the Xbox project

#196
post #162
post #135

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's the only software in the world I've tried to actively avoid buying and failed. At least 7 times now. It's the shopping channel of software. Whether or not you wanted it it comes bundled. I'm pretty sure it'd be a lot less popular if every OEM had a check box that said Ubuntu that deducted the license fee. MS frowns upon that sort of thing, though.

I found an article that says that OEMs pay around $10 for a Windows license, at least for tablets. If I was buying a new computer I’d probably keep Windows installed for $10 just in case I needed to dual boot some time in the future.

At some point they weren't paying anything for licenses on sub 9" devices. Although I swear it was 11" or 14" on Win10 at some point I can't find a reference.

https://www.onmsft.com/news/windows-10-9-remains-free-oems-a...

Re: An internal team 'hoodwinked' Bill Gates into launching the Xbox project

#197

Has Xbox ever been profitable for Microsoft? The rumors I have always heard indicated that it wasn't [1]. Maybe it was worthwhile for protecting their Windows business, maybe they never should have bothered. Even if it is profitable now (I can't find any information one way or another), it doesn't seem like it turned out to be a worthwhile investment. Maybe Steve Ballmer was right? [1] https://www.cgmagonline.com/201…

Kinect alone was a ~$1B loss from what I remember. They bought 2-3 time-of-flight companies to develop hardware, $300mil from what I remember, and it turned out to be too early so they had to license from primesense (Apple bought them later). Then on top of that it turned out gameplay it enabled was abysmal(latency).

Re: An internal team 'hoodwinked' Bill Gates into launching the Xbox project

#198

> "There was a meeting in a small conference room with Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer. And Steve never, I don't think, ever thought it was a good idea. There's a story I've told where I was standing in line in the cafeteria with Kevin, and Steve Ballmer snuck up behind us and yelled in my ear, making me throw my food: 'YOU'RE GOING TO LOSE ALL OUR MONEY!'” Steve Ballmer might be the funniest dude ever to run a tech com…

Ballmer is real life Todd Packer from The Office https://theoffice.fandom.com/wiki/Todd_Packer

Re: An internal team 'hoodwinked' Bill Gates into launching the Xbox project

#199

"Microsoft's choice of codename for the console project – Midway – was a deliberate statement, one that may seem problematic in a more enlightened age, referring as it does to the World War II battle in which US forces defeated the Japanese. " Hard to believe someone wrote that non-ironically...

When the words 'problematic' or 'enlightened' are used in a sentence without a trace of irony, the end result is rarely promising. It's like a litmus test for a certain kind of censorious attitude to life mixed with condescension.

Re: An internal team 'hoodwinked' Bill Gates into launching the Xbox project

#200

Has Xbox ever been profitable for Microsoft? The rumors I have always heard indicated that it wasn't [1]. Maybe it was worthwhile for protecting their Windows business, maybe they never should have bothered. Even if it is profitable now (I can't find any information one way or another), it doesn't seem like it turned out to be a worthwhile investment. Maybe Steve Ballmer was right? [1] https://www.cgmagonline.com/201…

I have seen it claimed that, roughly speaking, - The sale price of the Xbox itself pays for the per-unit cost of the machine - The percentage Microsoft gets of the sale price of games, adds just about enough to pay for the development and marketing costs, so at that point, the business doesn't do much better than breaking even - But when you add in the ongoing revenue from online gaming, that's where the profit comes…

After start up costs (starting from scratch with the original Xbox was certainly more expensive than iterating to the current version), in general, consoles are loss leaders and you make up for them in rights fees from games (console makers traditionally do much better than breaking even here). Online services, like Xbox live gold, is another revenue stream.

MS probably gets some value from more people getting Microsoft accounts, too.

Post reply on HN