Live data from Hacker News

Introducing the next generation of Mac

apple.com

191–200 of 1001 posts

Re: Introducing the next generation of Mac

#191
post #179

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Am I reading right that it only supports one display output? I may be reading that incorrectly....

It will only drive one 4k display at 60hz, I would imagine it would support multiple lower resolutions with no issues.

That would be weird. Thunderbolt 3 supports 2x 4K60, so this should as well.

Re: Introducing the next generation of Mac

#193

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm pretty sure they're all identical chips. No doubt there are clocking differences. But that may be automatic based on thermals and not actually represent a difference in the actual chip.

The base model m1 air has a 7 core gpu compared with 8 core in the others.

It probably has 8 cores, just that one failed and they disabled it. Making CPUs is expensive and a faulty process.

A lot of CPU given any release is the same high end CPU with faulty cores disabled.

Re: Introducing the next generation of Mac

#194
Lots of comments from people complaining about the lack of 32GB of RAM. Can someone explain to me the need for 32GB of RAM as a developer? Is it the IDE or your particular application area? As for me, I do all my professional development (C++17/Linux, Vim, EDA industry) on a five year old T450s with 12GB of RAM. For me the limiting factor is CPU power for sure. I only run out of RAM running some of the larger customer tests for which I have to go to a beefy machine in our network, but that happens rarely.

Re: Introducing the next generation of Mac

#195
post #72

Eehm. What is the actual difference between the MBA M1 and the MBP 13 M1? (except the latter is thicker?) Checked the compareison and didn‘t find anything substantial...

The MBP gets all 8 GPU cores, the MBA gets 7 (but you can upgrade the MBA to get all 8 for effectively $50 with a $200 upgrade to the storage as well). Touchbar and bigger battery. I think those are the only differences

I think also "Studio Microphone Quality" - whatever that means.

Re: Introducing the next generation of Mac

#196

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is a good point and begs an interesting question: will they continue using the same ARM chip across the whole line when the 16" MBP and the other iMacs make the switch, and if so, will all Macs of the same generation always have the same amount of RAM? Or will they branch the chips (M2 and M2S, or something)? Is RAM becoming less relevant when you have smart integration of software and hardware components, to a…

> Is RAM becoming less relevant when you have smart integration of software and hardware components, to a point where stratification is no longer necessary in most cases? If they intend these things to run software development, audio/video editing, CAD, or any other resource-intensive workloads, there will absolutely be demand for more.

I could see the M2 coming with 32GB across the board, at which point the only current outliers (setting aside the Mac Pro as a special case) would be the 64GB configuration for the 16" Macbook Pro and the 64GB and 128GB configurations for the iMac. I could imagine Apple's optimizations closing the performance gap with the current 64GB offerings, and then perhaps they just leave 128GB customers to go all the way for the Mac Pro. I would be surprised to hear that they sell very many 128GB iMacs right now anyway.

Re: Introducing the next generation of Mac

#197
post #194

Lots of comments from people complaining about the lack of 32GB of RAM. Can someone explain to me the need for 32GB of RAM as a developer? Is it the IDE or your particular application area? As for me, I do all my professional development (C++17/Linux, Vim, EDA industry) on a five year old T450s with 12GB of RAM. For me the limiting factor is CPU power for sure. I only run out of RAM running some of the larger custome…

I imagine that it's someone that runs either either a lot of virtual machines or a lot of Docker Containers.

Re: Introducing the next generation of Mac

#198

When I was an active software developer, I always had the biggest and beefiest machine possible, plus a MBP for when I was on the move. Now, off in another career field, I'm really wondering why I would choose a MPB over an iPad Air or Pro. By the time you add a keyboard to the iPad, it kinda feels like the only real difference is whether you want to run Xcode. Other than that, is there really anything you can do on…

The UX for multitasking is, in my opinion, still much better on a laptop that it is on the iPad.

Re: Introducing the next generation of Mac

#199

When I was an active software developer, I always had the biggest and beefiest machine possible, plus a MBP for when I was on the move. Now, off in another career field, I'm really wondering why I would choose a MPB over an iPad Air or Pro. By the time you add a keyboard to the iPad, it kinda feels like the only real difference is whether you want to run Xcode. Other than that, is there really anything you can do on…

> is there really anything you can do on a MBP that you can't do on an iPad?

If the App Store gatekeepers get their way then "run a shell".

(I've recently got my first iPad - my first iOS device in a very long time - and it's actually less locked down than I was expecting. I had no idea they had relaxed the rules on scripting on the device. But it's still way, way more locked down than a real computer)

Re: Introducing the next generation of Mac

#200
post #149

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I use 27 Gb of RAM currently on my hackintosh and none of my work VMs are on right now. No way I can get an arm Mac until they're available with 64+.

This. I was hitting a wall on RAM instantly at 32Gb.

Out of curiosity, doing what??
Post reply on HN