Live data from Hacker News

Aliens on 1k nearby stars could see us, new study suggests

livescience.com

191–200 of 226 posts

Re: Aliens on 1k nearby stars could see us, new study suggests

#191
post #97

I always wondered if they could see us, would they recognize us as something to care about? I see ants on my porch, but they don't really matter much to me.

People spend lifetimes studying ant behavior

Maybe we are not even a very interesting kind of ant from their perspective, and they are off studying something else.

Re: Aliens on 1k nearby stars could see us, new study suggests

#192
post #137

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There are problems of resiliency and energy storage that could be more or less fundamental problems. It could take millions if years of technological civilization to produce a machine capable of sustaining life for the hundreds of thousands of years necessary for interstellar travel, and civilizations may tend to collapse for various reasons before reaching such technological peaks. It's also entirely possible that w…

> It could take millions if years of technological civilization to produce a machine capable of sustaining life for the hundreds of thousands of years necessary for interstellar travel. For a generation ship, are you referring to all the machinery that can maintain a balanced ecosystem of plants and animals and humans in order to provide food for the people during the trip to the new planet, and to make all the thing…

Seems a bit silly, you can buy a glass sphere with small closed ecosystem that can last years with indirect sunlight. Surely we can manage something that recycles astronaut poop/pee into something vaguely edible with the help of bacteria, fungus, plants, and algae. Sure some genetic editing (of humans, bacteria, fungus, plants, and algae) might be necessary. Even just some minor tweak like happened in the last 1000s of years to make humans more compatible with cows milk.

Re: Aliens on 1k nearby stars could see us, new study suggests

#193
post #137

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> It could take millions if years of technological civilization to produce a machine capable of sustaining life for the hundreds of thousands of years necessary for interstellar travel. For a generation ship, are you referring to all the machinery that can maintain a balanced ecosystem of plants and animals and humans in order to provide food for the people during the trip to the new planet, and to make all the thing…

I'm always fascinated in the assumptions underlying some of these proposals, and how little thought they've given to the problem. For example, the complete disregard for the lives or autonomy of the "replacement crew", who are effectively treated as a consumable resource starting from childhood. Science fiction set on generation ships tends to be extremely gloomy for good reason.

Aren't all humans consumable resources for today's society?

Re: Aliens on 1k nearby stars could see us, new study suggests

#194

Earlier quoted context omitted.

17th century American settlers were fleeing an environment where the child mortality rate was at least 1/3rd even for the upper classes, nearly all land and wealth was controlled by inbred gangsters, and the penalties for petty theft or incorrect religious worship included public hanging. From that perspective, the risks associated with colonization may have seemed much more attractive than the best-case scenario of…

And the early colonies had their problems too. IIRC at least one colony enacted capital punishment for anyone caught abandoning the colony to join the native American tribes.

I hadn't heard that one, but the freedom-loving Pilgrims executed Quakers for proselytizing in Massachusetts. Not really an environment founded on respect for individual autonomy or other ethical considerations.

Re: Aliens on 1k nearby stars could see us, new study suggests

#195
post #99
post #74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't know why this got down-voted. The milky way is 100K light years across. It's 13.5 billion years old. It's entirely possible to blanket the whole galaxy with probes, without even getting into self replicating probes.

You have to make an assumption about speed - it certainly won't be more than a tiny fraction light speed. Eg voyager appear to travel now at less than 0.00006 c (16 km/s). Than turns 100k light years into ballpark 150 M year journey (no it doesn't its 1.8 bn years as mentioned in reply) . Still possible to cross 10.000 times - but that would be a straight line. I suspect the distances will grow somewhat fractally if…

There's current projects on earth seriously working on getting probes up to 1% of the speed of light. Just a small/light weight probe, a solar sail, and a large (but feasible) array of lasers.

Re: Aliens on 1k nearby stars could see us, new study suggests

#196
post #112

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Basically there is not need and motivation for humans to colonize anything outside the Earth. It's just too far, too expensive and too uncomfortable. Humans evolved specifically to live on Earth, to live somewhere else, they need to be severely altered. Now you just seeded civilization of another species, that might turn out to be confrontational or outright hostile. Why would you do that? Too see how well this works…

> Basically there is not need and motivation for humans to colonize anything outside the Earth. It's just too far, too expensive and too uncomfortable. There is definitely motivation. Some people want to colonise Mars. Not everybody, but likely enough people to make it happen. Elon Musk wants to make it happen, and while there is no guarantee he'll get his wish, I think he has a decent chance of succeeding. And estab…

It's certainly possible that we might visit Mars, but colonizing it just isn't possible within the foreseeable future, certainly not within Musk's lifetime. We're not even close to having the technology necessary to survive that kind of journey and the engineering, logistics and medical science required to actually start a colony is far beyond anything we are currently capable of.

Re: Aliens on 1k nearby stars could see us, new study suggests

#197
post #124
post #114

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm fairly confident we'll eventually find that our form of life is the result of intentional or unintentional colonization of Earth. If you look at how quickly life began after the oceans settled out, then look at precisely how complex even the most primitive forms of life are (in terms of likelihood of stochastic construction to the point of sophistication to support evolutionary mechanisms) it seems incredibly unl…

This is an interesting idea. Look at how religion explains the origin of life: A lifeform not from this planet, far more advanced than us, gave "the breath of life", and calls us their "children". The vastness of this universe leads me to believe that it's impossible to dismiss the idea that there is an intelligence/lifeform sufficiently advanced as to appear to be a God to us.

I read a short story that explained the explosion of life on earth during a very short period on some alien that didn't follow protocol and dumped some poop.

Re: Aliens on 1k nearby stars could see us, new study suggests

#198
post #6

> the zone where Earth's transit is visible gets smaller as you get closer to our solar system I’m trying to imagine why that is but cannot.

The article is just poorly written. Even the first line is messed up... > Those 1,004 star systems are in a direct line of sight to our planet... It's SPACE. Every star within 1000 light years is in a direct line of sight to every other star.

I’m not an expert but I don’t think this is true. The dark streak in the Milky Way (the “Great Rift”) is actually dust clouds that obscure our view of stars.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Rift_(astronomy)

Re: Aliens on 1k nearby stars could see us, new study suggests

#199

Earlier quoted context omitted.

and those ants don't know they are being studied/farmed

I'm not sure I like this line of reasoning because it implies that the ants aren't aware of us. Certainly they are in some cases. Ants are able to physically perceive us. So if aliens aren't using some means of passive remote sensing to study us then I don't see why we wouldn't also notice them (though they may have good reason to not use active means). Sure, the ants aren't aware of what why we're hanging out around…

https://xkcd.com/638/

Re: Aliens on 1k nearby stars could see us, new study suggests

#200

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you didn't know what ants were already they probably would be interesting

Sure, but if you were a billion years old and had seen ants before, it's unlikely that you'd take interest in any specific ant hill you walk by.

When you live to be a billion, you probably study ants just to have something better to do than bitch about joint pain.

And having seen many, many, many ant hills, specific ones with slight odd variations unnoticed by people who are merely a million years old would stand out like a flashing neon sign and you would be all "Hello! What, pray tell, is this?!" while everyone looked at you funny because they lack context.

Just sayin'...

Post reply on HN