Live data from Hacker News

YouTube: Community contributions will be discontinued across all channels

support.google.com

191–200 of 219 posts

Re: YouTube: Community contributions will be discontinued across all channels

#191
post #95

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Could you recommend a tool that does subtitles and generates a .srt afterwards, from your experience? I have a friend that translates everything from English for his grandmother, so she can watch movies that she does not understand, but he does it by hand in a video editing program. Would love to help him out.

I've tested a couple of the popular free ones, and settled on Aegisub. The default keybindings drove me nuts, they're not very ergonomic, but at least you can fix that easily. .srt is the lowest common denominator for subtitle files, every subtitling program can import and export those. It's a pretty dumb format though, my biggest issue with it is that it doesn't have support for fixed-position left-aligned subtitles…

Personally, I find the default keybinding for subtitle timing to be the best keybinding. But it's kinda not newcomer friendly.

Re: YouTube: Community contributions will be discontinued across all channels

#192
post #99

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've seen that too and I simply don't understand that. Why do some people half-translate an app? Did they just hardcode some of the copy by accident?

They translated it once years ago, likely using external resources. My team has had this issue; we made internationalized versions of our website once, years ago, and it was quite expensive and used external language contractors. Then the i18n versions gradually fell out of date as we continually updated the English version (because that's what we full-time devs speak). Eventually, years later, the i18n versions were…

But if you had put yourselves in a position to accept community contributed translations, this would not have happened, right?

Re: YouTube: Community contributions will be discontinued across all channels

#193

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They translated it once years ago, likely using external resources. My team has had this issue; we made internationalized versions of our website once, years ago, and it was quite expensive and used external language contractors. Then the i18n versions gradually fell out of date as we continually updated the English version (because that's what we full-time devs speak). Eventually, years later, the i18n versions were…

But if you had put yourselves in a position to accept community contributed translations, this would not have happened, right?

How is a random static marketing website for a corporation supposed to put itself into a position where it accepts community translations? How would you vet said translations before going live with them (which would be mandatory) given that you don't speak the language?

And who in the world would volunteer their labor for free to do said translations?

Re: YouTube: Community contributions will be discontinued across all channels

#194
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not quite. It seems like creators have until September 28 to choose to publish existing community contributions, and if they don't, it seems like they will all disappear. That's how I interpret, "You have until September 28, 2020 to publish your community contributions before they’re removed."

https://support.google.com/youtube/thread/61967856?hl=en If you have contributions currently saved as drafts, these will be available for the next 60 days (until Sept 28 2020), and you have until then to publish them before they’re removed. Any already published contributions (titles, descriptions, captions, etc) will continue to show up on videos and can be managed by Creators in YouTube Studio.

Ah, okay, thanks for explaining!

Re: YouTube: Community contributions will be discontinued across all channels

#195
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not quite. It seems like creators have until September 28 to choose to publish existing community contributions, and if they don't, it seems like they will all disappear. That's how I interpret, "You have until September 28, 2020 to publish your community contributions before they’re removed."

I've done some translating on YouTube. What it means is if your translation is in draft mode (you're still working on it) on 9/28 it will disappear. The video creator shouldn't need to do anything here.

Ah, okay, thanks for explaining!

Re: YouTube: Community contributions will be discontinued across all channels

#196

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But if you had put yourselves in a position to accept community contributed translations, this would not have happened, right?

How is a random static marketing website for a corporation supposed to put itself into a position where it accepts community translations? How would you vet said translations before going live with them (which would be mandatory) given that you don't speak the language? And who in the world would volunteer their labor for free to do said translations?

It was intended to be a strange mixture of snark, cynicism and sarcasm connecting your described situation with what Google is doing, with the hope of illuminating the different ways people might think about their own work.

In your case, describing it as "a random static marketing website for a corporation" more or less shuts down the discussion.

In Google's case, while they probably don't see YT in those same terms, the convergence of the approach towards i18n suggests that maybe they're a little closer to it than they were.

Re: YouTube: Community contributions will be discontinued across all channels

#197
post #173

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My feeling is that at Google, building something novel (e.g. community contributions) is more important than maintaining something (e.g. dealing with spam/abuse in community contributions). Unless it brings in profit or collects valuable user data, anything that takes developer hours to maintain eventually gets canned. There could be a code silo issue here as well. My understanding is Google dev teams are very mobile…

I hear this explanation a lot. What I don't get is how Google, a company known for being exceptionally clever in how it manages engineers, hasn't realized that their organizational structure causes this sort of build-and-abandon pattern. In any case, the rest of us at large shouldn't have to suffer just because Google can't figure out how to build meaningfully long-lasting services.

Build and abandon makes total sense for Google. They are participating in an IP land rush. Expect this to accelerate.

The engineers that Google hires to keep them from working for competitors are used to build as many new products and features as possible. Abandoned products are assets in Google's IP portfolio and continue to protect them against competing products and features long after Google has closed the door.

Re: YouTube: Community contributions will be discontinued across all channels

#198
And now just imagine Google managing Wikipedia.

"Community contributions allowed viewers to add closed captions, subtitles, and title/descriptions to videos. This feature was rarely used and had problems with spam/abuse so we’re removing them to focus on other creator tools."

With this rationale all wikis must close down. But no, they don't. They started to fight spam technically. And if I remember Google was also pretty good in this spamfighting niche, with Gmail, decades ago. Nowadays with YouTube and News shutting down apparently not anymore. Those Google PMs really made a name of themselves as worlds worst.

Re: YouTube: Community contributions will be discontinued across all channels

#199
post #30
post #9

Google just wants to eliminate any remaining trust users have in them, don't they? Every feature they remove, they do because it is a burden on feature velocity or maintenance. Fine, but why are they so bad at weighing it against long term trust? At this point, I expect the search box to search, Gmail to send emails, YouTube to host videos, maps to do navigation, and docs to edit docs. One core feature per platform,…

> Fine, but why are they so bad at weighing it against long term trust? I want to remind the loss aversion and status quo bias. We tend to evaluate losses more important than they are, which is why for example it is hard to throw seldom used things away. That said, why should feature removal mean automatic loss of trust? Because this feature is not important to me personally, it actually increases my trust that they…

Never heard the name "status quo bias" before, thanks for bringing that up.

I don't really care about this particular feature, but I do care about the trend. Why should a feature be sunset? It seems like this must be because of (a) bugs/maintenance burden or (b) a poor design or one that is mismatched with the current product direction. The fact that Google sunsets so many features and products suggests that both of these happen with high frequency. (b) is especially worrying, why can't they spend time before launching to figure out what they're going to do and commit to it? They aren't a small startup, they've got tons of resources. I'm sure they're trying, but whatever they're doing is not working, in my opinion.

For the record, I'm not a Google hater, but this is just so frustrating to watch as a user.

Re: YouTube: Community contributions will be discontinued across all channels

#200
post #9

Google just wants to eliminate any remaining trust users have in them, don't they? Every feature they remove, they do because it is a burden on feature velocity or maintenance. Fine, but why are they so bad at weighing it against long term trust? At this point, I expect the search box to search, Gmail to send emails, YouTube to host videos, maps to do navigation, and docs to edit docs. One core feature per platform,…

This is an HN bubble framing. The masses that enjoy YouTube don't "trust" google, YouTube is just another large entertainment platform among many, "trust" never enters the equation, its just an entertainment website.

Google has a brand, just like other companies e.g. BMW and Costco. We associate these with things like "reliable", and "cheap", and "luxury".

I think "high feature churn" will become a part of Google's brand.

Post reply on HN