Earlier quoted context omitted.
I’ve seen some writing on what makes marketplaces resilient to “supply side defection” as you call it, but I’d love to hear your take. Specifically I’d love to hear more about structuring to leverage the relationship, or anything else you think is important. What specific structural things are important?
Generally speaking: your participants will use you when they need you and cut you out when they can do so cheaply. This isn't an indictment of them: it's completely rational for them to do this. But that means it's up to you to add value to the transaction, until the perceived cost of defection is higher than the platform margin. Airbnb did this beautifully: they set up insurance for all their hosts, and so were able…
How to Kill a Startup Idea with Google Keyword Planner and AdWords: A Case Study
191–193 of 193 posts
Re: How to Kill a Startup Idea with Google Keyword Planner and AdWords: A Case Study
#192I think they missed the opportunity to add some value to the market, by doing some kind of background checks to ensure the teachers are safe to let into your kids home. Trust is an element people always look for above all else.
It’s a value add for the first contact. But after you hire the teacher, why would you need the middleman? For continuing background checks?
You could also charge a fee for doing a credit check on the other side.
Re: How to Kill a Startup Idea with Google Keyword Planner and AdWords: A Case Study
#193A "startup studio" and a "venture capital fund" ??? no conflict there !! Like, great, please send us your detailed startup plan and then come pitch and answer our questions, and then.... well, its not a good match and we pass 99% of the time, but hey, look at this back office studio we got going here, trying out new ideas we have never heard of before.
I think you misunderstand how VCs work. If you come to them with a strong idea and evidence that you have built up that it will work and a plan for how to move forward and the right people and you try to get them to take equity they have really no incentive to to say no to you and try to build the thing themselves without you, when it would be so much easier just to help you build it.
Your logic is true for an 8-figure VC fund. Its more nuanced for a technically-proficient group looking at 5-6-digit (pre)seed rounds.