Live data from Hacker News

Facebook Hit by Apple’s Crackdown on Messaging Feature

theinformation.com

191–192 of 192 posts

Re: Facebook Hit by Apple’s Crackdown on Messaging Feature

#191
post #117
post #96

Am I reading this right? If WhatsApp and similar are no longer able to implement End-To-End crypto because they have to use an Apple API which supports only specific protocols, this is going to be a huge loss for users. I've considered switching to an iOS device, but stuff like this keeps me away, I'm very glad I can keep direct SIP, SSH, IMAP and XMPP connections open at all hours of the day.

Not being able to lurk in the background does not have anything to do with security. I don’t think Signal uses it and they’re generally considered secure. You can check out their source.

I read a reply on Twitter explaining why it was used on Signal (and I can't update my own statement anymore). So basically these push notifications are used because they always work and they work for everything.

If you would use the custom notification handler you are required to show a notification, which is fine for a new message but doesn't make sense for read confirmations, "is writing" updates or all other types of information that should not pop up to the user immediately.

Of course you can work around it by using a WebSocket while the app is open and only use push notifications for new messages but obviously that's going to be less tight than the current situation.

Re: Facebook Hit by Apple’s Crackdown on Messaging Feature

#192
post #132
post #80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Facebook engineers know exactly what is going on, and I don't think they actually care. I know of founders who would need to think carefully about even interviewing someone with Facebook on their resume. And I totally get these concerns given the attitude Facebook has towards the privacy of users.

What a witch hunt. This is akin to persecuting people for their politics.

s/politics/ethics/
Post reply on HN