Live data from Hacker News

uBlock Origin 1.20

github.com

191–200 of 338 posts

Re: uBlock Origin 1.20

#191
post #121
post #54

I am dumbfounded that uBlock Origin, arguably the single most important extension in modern web browsing, and one that makes millions of lives easier by making their web experience bearable at all, all of this depends on one single person, working for free. Now there's also the list maintainers, who also work for free. Still makes you wonder about how the world works. There's probably many other similar instances. In…

Yes, this. uBlock Origin seems to have ~15 million active users between Chrome and Firefox (source https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UBlock_Origin#uBlock_Origin ). If it only spared us 10 seconds a day on average (probably a super conservative estimate), it would save the equivalent of an average human life (~70yrs) every 15 days! (And given that probably at least 70% of users don't use an ad blocker, it's infuriating to…

it is way more. more like up to 50 million.

Re: uBlock Origin 1.20

#192

Is there a good short answer for why uBlock is using constructs like this: if ( self.browser instanceof Object ) { self.chrome = self.browser; } else { self.browser = self.chrome; } Instead of using a polyfill like that one https://github.com/mozilla/webextension-polyfill ?

This polyfill is useful if you want your Firefox-based extension to seamlessly run as a Chromium-based extension.

However uBO's code base was primarily that of a Chromium-based extension (it predates Firefox WebExtensions), and Firefox extensions API does not require a polyfill to run Chromium-based extensions.

So roughly I just needed both `chrome` and `browser` references to access the same API, the long term goal being to opportunistically replace all instances of `chrome` with `browser` (I find the later more vendor neutral).

Re: uBlock Origin 1.20

#193
post #54

I am dumbfounded that uBlock Origin, arguably the single most important extension in modern web browsing, and one that makes millions of lives easier by making their web experience bearable at all, all of this depends on one single person, working for free. Now there's also the list maintainers, who also work for free. Still makes you wonder about how the world works. There's probably many other similar instances. In…

Is there a way to donate to the uBlock Origin project? If you want to imagine what the world would be like without uBlock, just try turning it off for a day. That's horrifying.

Re: uBlock Origin 1.20

#194
post #6

Just read Microsoft will allow ad blocker extensions (May build one in) in their new Chromium browser. Looks like I’m going to rewind 13 years and use IE again(IE of today). Such a stupid move by the do no evil company! Now they do no stupid too. EDIT: Here is link... https://www.forbes.com/sites/kateoflahertyuk/2019/06/16/micr...

Since it keeps being misquoted: the motto was "don't be evil", not "don't do evil".

Re: uBlock Origin 1.20

#195
post #103

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sounds a lot like what Chrome is bringing in.

Chrome has a limit on the amount of the items in the list. Originally, Google wanted to max at 30k items, but after the outry, they increased it to 150k. For comparison, my uBlock has currently 101k of net filters and 49k cosmetic filters.

Safari also has a limit, and it's low enough that plugin developers have had to split their work into multiple parallel plugins or even into standalone macOS applications.

Re: uBlock Origin 1.20

#196

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> As far as I know, it hasn't been removed nor lessened. IIRC they lessened it by some ε > 0 in 1803. [1] > As far as I remember, it is absolutely overreaching, collecting your name, email address, browsing history, searches, application usage and more. Some of these seem more alarming than others. Where are each of these pulled from? If you have a Microsoft account they already have your name and address. Most peopl…

I'm almost entirely certain that the storing the Bit locker FDE key in your Microsoft account is an optional choice presented during the BitLocker setup.

It definitely is. It’s not even very prominent - you have to intentionally click on it.

Re: uBlock Origin 1.20

#197
post #124
post #115

Earlier quoted context omitted.

OBS is interesting because not only is it one of the best programs available for what it does (and cross platform to boot, which is huge), but it's also a catalyst for making people an absurd amount of money. Pretty much every top streamer uses it. I wouldn't be surprised if OBS was responsible for generating over $75 million worth of earnings for just the top streamers on Twitch in the last few years, then there's T…

FYI OBS' main developer has a Patreon with $1.4k/month https://www.patreon.com/obsproject and an annual budget (for the entire project) of $90k through OpenCollective https://opencollective.com/obsproject

Seems like pennies considering how widespread OBS is used

Re: uBlock Origin 1.20

#199

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> As far as I know, it hasn't been removed nor lessened. IIRC they lessened it by some ε > 0 in 1803. [1] > As far as I remember, it is absolutely overreaching, collecting your name, email address, browsing history, searches, application usage and more. Some of these seem more alarming than others. Where are each of these pulled from? If you have a Microsoft account they already have your name and address. Most peopl…

I'm almost entirely certain that the storing the Bit locker FDE key in your Microsoft account is an optional choice presented during the BitLocker setup.

Recently due to a firmware upgrade losing the key I had to do the disable/enable dance for Bitlocker and you need to store the key somewhere removeable (usb stick etc) which is enough of pain I just went for a Microsoft account.

You can remove them easily enough from a Microsoft account.

Re: uBlock Origin 1.20

#200
post #47

I've just noticed Safari is stuck at 1.16 and I've been using a fork. Anyone here uses Safari as their main browsing tool and has a good alternative? I mean 1.16 seems to do the job just fine, but if it falls behind too far...

Setup a Pi-Hole and don't depend on browser-level but network-level ad blocking.

Couldn't one just use a hosts file, eg with Gas Mask?

https://github.com/2ndalpha/gasmask

(And btw, uBlock origin can do more than block certain IPs)

Post reply on HN