Happens to me in chrome every single day. I think it's a bug in how they're detecting potential bots. Of course no one at Google will listen when you submit reports. Especially the one about selecting street lights/stop lights/crosswalks.
Google's Captcha in Firefox vs. in Chrome
191–200 of 503 posts
Re: Google's Captcha in Firefox vs. in Chrome
#192Re: Google's Captcha in Firefox vs. in Chrome
#193Re: Google's Captcha in Firefox vs. in Chrome
#194I thought this was just me and their stupid caption being impossible for even humans to solve; turns out I was just being gaslighted this entire time and they're just discriminating against Firefox users? How does the EU or someone not shut down this sort of anti-competative monopolostic nosense? I didn't think I could get more furious about having to struggle with these captions all day, but somehow I am. Please eve…
they're just discriminating against Firefox users? At least part of the behaviour shown in the video depends on factors like cookies, IP address, and whether you have features like anti-fingerprinting protection turned on. [1] Recaptcha is frustrating and I dislike it, especially the slow fade-ins and multiple challenges, but if you repeat the test shown in the video you won't find it 100% repeatable just because you…
Re: Google's Captcha in Firefox vs. in Chrome
#195I've never understood what happened to reCAPTCHA, it was originally so great and is now just so, so toxic. Originally it was an awesome solution based on OCR'ing books that usually worked quickly on the first try, and almost never took more than two. Then it turned into a single checkbox (analyzing mouse movement) so it was even faster... and I remember some simple image-based like "select the images of cats" that we…
Re: Google's Captcha in Firefox vs. in Chrome
#196It makes me sad that they are so pervasive or I would categorically refuse to engage with any site that uses reCaptcha.
Re: Google's Captcha in Firefox vs. in Chrome
#197I'm from the UK and often get very American questions. Such as "select all the images with cross-walks". This isn't really a phrase we have over here, so when I first got this I had no idea what I was meant to be looking for in the array of random pictures and actually had to look it up to get past it. If you're going to force me to do a captcha, at least localise the damn questions. Do other non-American's get this…
Re: Google's Captcha in Firefox vs. in Chrome
#198Earlier quoted context omitted.
you may be right about the fade-out and delay but the time spent fading in only hampers humans not bots. As soon as it starts fading in the image is present in non-faded form and the bots can start processing it.
> the time spent fading in only hampers humans not bots Not necessarily, contrast adds detail and mistakes are expensive, so bots too are incentivized to wait for the final picture (this assuming that network communications aren't monitored to get the incoming image out of the request). Also clicking on that image too early is a good signal that it's a bot.
Unless Google is literally streaming in the image frame-by-frame, I'll admit I haven't looked into the details but this doesn't seem likely as it's pretty complicated compared to just using an image.
Re: Google's Captcha in Firefox vs. in Chrome
#1992016-2019: working for google - analyzing street footage for implementing AI for self driving cars.
Maybe I should also invoice google for the effort.
Re: Google's Captcha in Firefox vs. in Chrome
#200Google Captcha is a complete mess at this point and I often leave websites that use it if it's not essential to what I am doing