Earlier quoted context omitted.
PCs were designed to be devices for people to create things. I think you have an idealized view of how most people use PCs. Even during the first era of PCs in the 80s, most kids used them for playing games. By the mid 90s, it was all about games and “multimedia” on CDs. Then Facebook and social media games. The geeks that looked forward to InCider, Nybble, and whatever the offshoot computer mag from 3-2-1 Contact we…
The geeks that looked forward to InCider, Nybble, and whatever the offshoot computer mag from 3-2-1 Contact were and typed BASIC programs in were the minority. But if you look at the PC magazines from the late 80s/early 90s, magazines not even oriented at "developers" but more "power users", you'll find huge chunks of content devoted to programming --- not just BASIC, but Asm (DOS's DEBUG command was the preferred me…
A new digital divide: Young people who can’t use keyboards
191–200 of 365 posts
Re: A new digital divide: Young people who can’t use keyboards
#192Re: A new digital divide: Young people who can’t use keyboards
#193The first example provided in the article (indeed the first sentence) is “How do I double click?”, and I want to focus on this. As a kid in the 90s, I just took double clicking as a necessary evil. But after many many opportunities of trying (mostly successfully) to teach it to both the elderly and to kids, I've gradually grown to hate it. It's such a horrible gesture, difficult to perform, complicated to reason abou…
Re: A new digital divide: Young people who can’t use keyboards
#194Earlier quoted context omitted.
As someone who recently worked in education... yes. Anecdotally, I tended to see it at the community-college level with students who owned a large-screen phone and didn't own a computer. I don't think anyone is writing whole research papers or serious lab reports on phones. A two-page reading response is totally doable. Something with footnotes or equations, not so much.
Yes, one can technically vomit out a few hundred words using a small touch screen. But the tools make it damn difficult to edit and re-organize text. Does this mean that all such reports are basically stream-of-consciousness writing instead of a more carefully polished piece of work?
Re: A new digital divide: Young people who can’t use keyboards
#195Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's fascinating. Is the video representative of texting speed, or is this the fastest human in the world? Are they making choices that would take effort in a different system, or just clicking the next suggested letter?
>Is the video representative of texting speed, or is this the fastest human in the world? From what I understand, he's on the faster end of the normal range. >Are they making choices that would take effort in a different system, or just clicking the next suggested letter? With Japanese kanji or Chinese hànzì, there's no practical way to directly input such a large range of characters. Users type a phonetic spelling,…
Re: A new digital divide: Young people who can’t use keyboards
#196Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not sure what your point is. Coding is significantly harder than writing or pressing two buttons on a video camera, which is also visible in salaries - basic journalist vs. basic camera operator vs. basic coder
Well the UK Day rate for a Camera Operator (labour only) is around £420 for TV and £600 for film - which compares quite well for the contractor rates - and you wont fall foul or IR 35. Journalists your right - there is a lot of young people who have the dream of being the next woodwood and Bernstein - and so news paper publishers take advantage.
> "You have to be very sure you want to do it because it involves years of long hours, challenging conditions and low pay."
https://www.theguardian.com/money/2013/mar/12/how-become-tv-...
I doubt there are minimum wage software developers.
Re: A new digital divide: Young people who can’t use keyboards
#197Earlier quoted context omitted.
The geeks that looked forward to InCider, Nybble, and whatever the offshoot computer mag from 3-2-1 Contact were and typed BASIC programs in were the minority. But if you look at the PC magazines from the late 80s/early 90s, magazines not even oriented at "developers" but more "power users", you'll find huge chunks of content devoted to programming --- not just BASIC, but Asm (DOS's DEBUG command was the preferred me…
And for most platforms you need to pay to develop your own programs, a no go for most teenagers.
Nowadays it's even easier to learn how to program without paying anything.
Re: A new digital divide: Young people who can’t use keyboards
#198The first example provided in the article (indeed the first sentence) is “How do I double click?”, and I want to focus on this. As a kid in the 90s, I just took double clicking as a necessary evil. But after many many opportunities of trying (mostly successfully) to teach it to both the elderly and to kids, I've gradually grown to hate it. It's such a horrible gesture, difficult to perform, complicated to reason abou…
Actually, a lot of people have trouble just single-clicking, so double-clicking is even more of a challenge.
A lot of people just can't get the knack for clicking twice in quick succession. And the inconsistency between when they should single-click and when they should double-click causes a lot of confusion.
I think it probably would make life easier to get rid of the double-click.
Re: A new digital divide: Young people who can’t use keyboards
#199Earlier quoted context omitted.
What do you mean, "stays an April's Fool"? There are circuit schematics as well as software for it, all available under an open source license: https://github.com/google/mozc-devices/tree/master/mozc-furi...
There's no commercial product? I'd love to be proven wrong though.
Re: A new digital divide: Young people who can’t use keyboards
#200Earlier quoted context omitted.
I highly doubt you'll find a 14 year old who swipes at a book... kids very quickly learn context and rules of physics. It's much harder when some screens are touch screens and some are not, however, but I see adults trying to swipe non-touch screens all the time (mall displays, ads, iMacs etc.)
I’m in my mid-thirties, and I have definitely tried to swipe my MacBook Pro screen a few times. I don’t think it’s an indication of anything troubling. Sometimes you just get lost in what you’re reading and momentarily forget what device you’re using. If anything, I’m glad teens are so absorbed by reading. It was a struggle to get the teens of my generation to read anything!
I remember how when I was a teen and coding a lot inside the Turbo C IDE, it became second nature to press F2 frequently (to save).
Around that time, while working on math homework (on paper), I'd occasionally experience brain farts, where I would think of pressing (not reach for) the F2 key.
FWIW, I have decent handwriting today, and even exchange correspondence with some friends using pen-and-paper.
I do agree that touchscreen usage should be restricted for toddlers.