Live data from Hacker News

Firefox 57.0 Released

mozilla.org

191–200 of 836 posts

Re: Firefox 57.0 Released

#191
post #139

I'm on windows 7, the new version seems to keep spawning a process which grinds my machine to a halt. I've had to open task manager twice now to kill it. Only downloaded it 10 minutes ago.

Try starting Firefox in safe mode in case that's some broken extension: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/troubleshoot-firefox-is...

No extensions installed. Literally just downloaded firefox.

Re: Firefox 57.0 Released

#192
post #128

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Mozilla doesn't create all those extensions. And the extensions' authors had, what, two years advance warning or so? Criticize the real culpits, not Mozilla.

My browser and extensions did useful things yesterday that they do not do today. Who changed something in the meantime? Obviously I paid nothing for Firefox and Mozilla owes me the same nothing in return, but if it wants to keep users and remain significant, breaking arguably its main advantage might not be the best plan.

That's not true. Your browser does exactly the same things that it did yesterday.

If you chose to update to the new version where you knew exactly what extensions would be running and which wouldn't... well, your fault.

Re: Firefox 57.0 Released

#193
post #132

Is there some super-compelling reason why FF doesn't let you inspect websocket frames? I was taking FF for a drive yesterday, based on the earlier thread, and it was nice until I started debugging my web app. I'm not interested in trusting a third party extension with all my network data either, so the plug-in to do this isn't an option. It's weird, but this really is a blocker for me for general use.

Sorry about that inconvenience. The current plan is to revisit WebSocket debugging in Q1 next year, per https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=885508.

Part of the delay is the complete rewrite that most of the DevTools are undergoing. As we move from legacy, in-house solutions (XUL) to standard web technology (HTML/JS, React/Redux, etc.) as part of the "devtools.html" project: https://github.com/devtools-html/

Re: Firefox 57.0 Released

#195
post #123

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can change the theme to "light" in preferences. If should get rid of the black bar. This has been a common complaint from osx users.

Can't seem to find where it is in firefox preferences. Could you please extend your solution?

Found by going to Tools->Add-Ons and then clicking Themes

Re: Firefox 57.0 Released

#196
post #52

Can one run the new version alongside a previous version? I need to access occasionally extensions unsupported in the new version: namely Scrapbook and the extension that provides maff file support.

The developer of Waterfox has promised to continue supporting "legacy" add-ons, so that's an option you can explore.

Re: Firefox 57.0 Released

#198
post #126

This is so close to great but can a mac snob ask how to get a more consistent UI experience out of firefox? I'm totally happy with how everything behaves inside the web panel but: 1. At a minimum I'd be happy with a toolbar icon set that was a little more in step with OS X design (but willing to hear if I just have misunderstanding of design :D) 2. As a reach, os-native menus or at least more native-style menus for t…

And I would add to this, if it is possible, integration with keychain

This was possible until today and FF57 with the "Keychain Services Integration" plugin -- but it can't be ported to WebExtensions.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/keychain-serv...

I will miss it and I'm not sure what to do next.

Re: Firefox 57.0 Released

#199
post #29

From the announcement post [1]: > As part of our focus on user experience and performance in Firefox Quantum, Google will also become our new default search provider in the United States and Canada. Does that mean the deal with Yahoo! has lapsed? And is there a new deal with Google, or no deal at all? (And what would be the revenue impact of that?) Edit: Just saw an announcement for this as well [2], with no word abo…

The details of these deals aren't generally public, so I don't expect to see any official answers about this.

Well, it's particularly interesting when you tie these two facts together:

> According to documents filed with the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC), Yahoo paid Mozilla $375 million in 2015, and is obligated for the same amount each year through 2019 under a five-year contract.

> Under terms of a contract that has been seen by Recode, whoever acquires Yahoo might have to pay Mozilla annual payments of $375 million through 2019 if it does not think the buyer is one it wants to work with and walks away.

Re: Firefox 57.0 Released

#200
post #181

For those who look for NoScript replacement, uMatrix[0] (from the maker of uBlock Origin) has got you covered (with "A Desperately Needed User’s Guide"[1]). [0] https://addons.mozilla.org/en-GB/firefox/addon/umatrix/ [1] http://adamantine.me/index.php/2015/11/18/umatrix-desperatel...

One odd deficiency of uMatrix and NoScript I found is that uBlock Origin gives you the ability to block scripts by filename, whereas uMatrix and NoScript can only get as refined as subdomain and scheme. My current setup is some mutant combination of all three, but I would hope that this functionality might converge at some point.
Post reply on HN