Live data from Hacker News

Never Completed Game

nevercompletedgame.com

191–200 of 217 posts

Re: Never Completed Game

#191

Earlier quoted context omitted.

explanation: looking at the keyboard those spell out TXCC. There's a town Corpus Cristi, Texas...

Can you elaborate, please?

The letters represent locations on a QWERTY keyboard. If you draw out one "word" at a time, you get patterns that look (... if you squint a little) like T X C C.

Re: Never Completed Game

#194

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can you elaborate, please?

The letters represent locations on a QWERTY keyboard. If you draw out one "word" at a time, you get patterns that look (... if you squint a little) like T X C C.

Ah, I see, thanks!

Re: Never Completed Game

#196
post #97

Is HN competing with 4chan on this? I'm gonna be pretty disappointed if we lose.

No, simply because HN doesn't have the culture of "Here's a problem, let's collaborate on it". We're much more likely to discuss the problem itself and discuss the pros and cons of different approaches. If you ask for help with a specific problem you'll probably get it, but I don't think there's the same viewpoint that if a puzzle is posted we need to solve it as a collective as quickly as possible.

If you post on HN about a problem, you'll likely get 1 useful answer and 6 answers pointing out that your problem is symptomatic of a wrongheaded approach and you should be doing something else instead :)

Re: Never Completed Game

#199
post #34
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

still not getting it, tried 4.6692 and 46692 e: got it, thanks!

It's a mathematical constant. Answer is Feigenbaum.

Gah! I entered "feigenbaum's constant", but it didn't accept that, so I kept looking for another relevant term.

Re: Never Completed Game

#200

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm thinking this is more of an example of what NOT to do; it's inconsistent and destroys confidence, which in turn makes the user mistrust the author through repeated mistakes and eventually quit. I would argue that far, far more people have fallen to that than some author-instilled urge to continue on due to confidence and ego. For example: "2 + 1 = ?": you are expected to answer with a number to complete the equat…

There's no rule that states you should provide correct answer on the first try.

What's annoying is that when I typed "primes", it was the correct answer, but was rejected because of poor UX/lazy coding.
Post reply on HN