Live data from Hacker News

Walmart's effort to get customers to build up their savings accounts

theatlantic.com

191–200 of 222 posts

Re: Walmart's effort to get customers to build up their savings accounts

#191
post #114
post #68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You do realize you're talking to people who've never had to use these services, never made under $40K (except when living at home), and are many steps removed from ever having to go through this? Yeah. I have. I did the Green Dot. Pile of shit, with hidden service fees, usage fees, loading fees, fee fees. Oh yeah, YC. Ive been on food stamps. I've been on unemployment. Even been homeless for a time. Right now, I have…

I think another point to be made is the OP is correct - most non-bank alternatives are horrible, but so much of modern society is inaccessible if you do not have a bank account or bank account analog. Also, to quote from the article. "Check-cashing outfits, payday lenders, and similar businesses are often thought of as merely preying on poor people, who, the conventional wisdom goes, tend to make bad financial decisi…

> I think another point to be made is the OP is correct - most non-bank alternatives are horrible, but so much of modern society is inaccessible if you do not have a bank account or bank account analog.

Indeed. And I'm still paying for it after many years. I got fucked over with payment reordering for bank-profit maximization, even with "overdraft" disabled. Didn't matter. Because whatever the bank says, is the ordained truth. And when your name gets on ChexSystems and other lists, you're done for.

My wife was did in similarly. The local credit union said she owed $120 for previous account issues that pertained to her then ex-husband. Didn't matter. The bank said it was hers, and too bad. There is no recourse. The bank/CU is god, no if's ands or buts. And suffice it to say, if you're in this position, there's no money for a libel suit (which is what it is, without a court determination).

> "Check-cashing outfits, payday lenders, and similar businesses are often thought of as merely preying on poor people, who, the conventional wisdom goes, tend to make bad financial decisions. Lisa Servon, a University of Pennsylvania professor of city and regional planning, offers a different angle in her recent book, The Unbanking of America: How the New Middle Class Survives. During Servon’s research working as a teller at a check casher and payday lender, consumers told her that the fee structures of nonbank alternatives were more transparent and predictable than those at conventional banks—crucial to anyone living on a budget."

I would agree with the transparency discussion. But it's also much more predatory. They get their pound of flesh. And this flesh is taken every time you use it. Banks do cover up and obfuscate their fee structure, but if you have the usual minimum balance, you'll never see this. Banks also rely on lack of CSR's for rich people. Because money's nothing, not a big deal. Bills are minuscule compared to income.

> I understand where you're coming from, I was in the payday loan trap at one point.. robbing peter to pay paul as it were, I made much less than 40k a year, its only in the last 5 years I've started to get north of 50k, and gotten comfortable.. now I save save save..

Yeah, it's not common to see people here who know what this all means. Fortunately, I was able to avoid the payday trap.. But not student loan trap, credit card trap, medical trap.. Right now, I have a garnishment for an injury sustained in 2008. Had insurance, but the physical therapy "wasn't approved". For a while, I was job hopping a bit and stayed ahead of the garnishments. And unemployment is ungarnishable in Indiana.

Credit cards.. Well. I had them when I had a job. Paying them down is hard without one. But it's easy money to get food and basics when you're waiting for unemployment. Fortunately, a few of them have been written off.. but that just burns another bank. At least Google Voice allows me to shitcan creditors, especially when I dont have the capability to pay.

School debt is a whole 'nther area. I got into my accident which caused my medical debt, but also caused all those classes to fail. But the school gets their cut, regardless if you do well or not. The school can do horrendously, apathetically, and cutthroat.. and they're guaranteed their money no matter what.

I did schooling at a "proper 4 year university" with frankly nothing to show for it. And I believe this burden should also be shared in part with the organization that also failed me in my educational goals. But, even this "Public University" is run much more as a Business than a public trust or institution. But likely, I'll be paying this off with garnishments in my Social Security.

In reality, this whole area is a sore point. Many people here, given the focus of HN, will never have to suffer like this. They'll also never know the pain of hurting, and not being able to fix (no medical care). They'll not know what it means to go hungry because you're waiting for the unemployment to start along with food stamps. They won't know the shame of walking into the food pantry, or using the foodstamp card. Nor will they see the looks you get, when you borrow your mother's vehicle to get the groceries... How dare you not be dressed in tatters and driving a rust-eaten beater truck.

It comes down to understanding "Us" vs "Them". I was an "Us", and remember that well. I'm on my way to being a "Them". Faking it, living the culture, understanding the nuance. But I understand, and seeing many posters here in this thread brings back all that anger of being taken advantage of, and having no power to do anything about it.

Re: Walmart's effort to get customers to build up their savings accounts

#192

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I find it a bit disgusting actually But withdrawing and depositing money is a service that costs the banks money to do doesn't it? I'm can see why you don't like but I can't see it as morally 'disgusting'. Would you look after someone else's meagre current account for them, and give it back on demand, for free? I wouldn't. I don't really know who covers that cost in the UK. It's certainly not interest they earn len…

Those are the costs associated with running a bank. It's paid for by giving them access to our capital, that they can use to invest. Have we forgotten what a bank is for? It's to conveniently and safely store money. Part of that convenience is to withdraw and store money at many locations. If a bank didn't offer that they wouldn't get my money.

"Free checking" is a relatively new practice in banking that really only caught fire after ATMs were invented. Banks would charge fees on transactions--like most financial services do.

Even now, most free checking accounts only require a certain amount of money, transactions they collect fees on, etc.

With interest rates so low, they don't make much just holding onto 500 dollars for someone.

Savings accounts had less fees, but you couldn't use them to write checks out of, etc.

Re: Walmart's effort to get customers to build up their savings accounts

#193

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> "checking" account is just a terminology It's what you might call a "salary account" in other places then. It's where your pay(check - haha) ends up, and what you use for regular day to day transactions such as paying bills. I also get confused when abroad and there are buttons to withdraw from "checking" "savings" etc. I have a handful of accounts that I name myself so it's always hard to know.

> you might call a "salary account" in other places UK => Current Account AU => Transaction Account (although my bank brands it as an 'Everyday' account) The worst thing about US Checking accounts is that they don't come with checks, and you have to arrange with a third-party printer to get a book of checks sent to you.

When I opened my account with my credit union they gave me 2 free boxes of checks. In the 5 years since I haven't even used a single book of them so this should be a sufficient supply for a lifetime.

Re: Walmart's effort to get customers to build up their savings accounts

#194

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Another reasoning for joining a credit union — being able to deposit and withdraw from any nearby credit union whether it's your own or not for no fee.

Assuming there is a credit union nearby. The point of that snippet seemed to be that Wal Mart was much more convenient than a bank.

Well not much more convenient than one particular branch of one particular bank, yeah, but I don't think that cashing a check for free is something that other banks do for non-members (compared to credit unions).

Re: Walmart's effort to get customers to build up their savings accounts

#195

Slighlty offtopic - but why are not debit cards popular in US. A card in which you put money and withdraw/pay untill they ran out. No overdraft/credit/direct debit bullshit to be concerned with. They are perfect solutions for the poor and underbanked... whatever that means. Small fees, small charges, impossible to rack gazzilion dollars in penalty fees.

The whole idea of being 'unbanked' or 'underbanked' is so foreign to me (as an Australian). The whole state of banking just seems so antiquated in the US... I'm 26, and I've never written a cheque. Public schools over here have (or at least had, not sure how it works today) programs where every student would get a bank account in the first grade with no fees (until they finished study). You'd actually bring in your b…

"The whole idea of being 'unbanked' or 'underbanked' is so foreign to me"

I explained it to Korean coworker that our debtors prison is implemented as a house arrest or like an economic parole release.

So if you owe child support because you're unemployed you can't use a bank because the money would disappear. You can't get money from a job in the system it would disappear so cash pay please. Or you can't go to the courthouse and get it fixed because lawyers cost money and see above you're unemployed. Once you're in debtors prison there's a whole bunch of things you can no longer do, just like being under house arrest or parole. For example, for a couple decades 90s-10s we had universal default as a stated written policy. We still have it, just unstated, which confuses foreigners. On paper we don't have universal default since 2010 or so. In practice we still have it today, more or less.

Adding to the complexity we do have actual debtors prisons most famously in the rural south but to some extent or another there are some everywhere.

I guess another way to explain it is part of our culture is explicit and written and people read it, like generally speaking the bible or the -ez single page income tax form. Then there's a layer thats written and people make a great show of not reading like mortgage or car loans or insurance contracts. Next down there's unwritten stuff that people understand like the debtors prison thing is I think fairly uncontroversial and reasonably well informed. Below that there's stuff we kinda unconsciously by osmosis know, like the "unbanked"="house arrest debtors prison" or "underbanked"="financial equivalent of parole complete with abused arbitrary rules". At the bottom there's weird esoteric stuff like non-propaganda related economic theory and history. And the level of awareness is extremely uneven across the entire nation (fairly uniform across subcultures, mostly).

Re: Walmart's effort to get customers to build up their savings accounts

#197

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The middle class in America average about $50k in household income ($25k each). Regardless of income, by definition, the middle class should always average out to basically break even unless we are in periods of rapid growth. This should happen because their willingness to pay for food and shelter is determined by what they make and eventually prices will catch up to income if income doesnt grow. I imagine the concep…

That's under the assumption that people don't want to save any money.

Its also under the assumption that a socioeconomic class that never amounted to more than 1% of a population historically, after temporarily booming in population, somehow isn't going to go away or back to historical norms. Sure the middle class can't disappear, just 75% of the population in manual labor factory jobs can't just disappear. Something can't happen because it would disturb my carefully crafted worldview. Sure.

Re: Walmart's effort to get customers to build up their savings accounts

#198
I know we're all pretty wealthy here on HN and only a very small fraction of us like myself were ever poor (I was dirt poor in my uni years, where to park the Ferrari while I was in the luxury dorms was not a problem for me, LOL).

The point I'm making is has anyone here, anyone, used this?

Because I have some questions. At my employer they get a commission for signing up which comes out of the fees and my employer likes money, so they have tables at the care fair and had salespeople visit each department trying to convince us to let them pay us via a highly fee'd VISA networked debit card instead of "old fashioned" direct deposit to my checking account.

But what I don't understand, and probably should have asked the HR lady and salesperson when they put on the show, is how does this even work day to day? Like I probably don't spend more than $1K retail in total per month, mostly food. And I usually spend on average less than $1K per month online shopping (computer hardware, clothes, just "stuff"). Most of my pay goes into non-credit payable bills. I have a bunch of bills that do ACH direct withdraw from my checking, I hand write 5 paper checks per year, 4 to the water utility that won't online or direct bill because their whole system is like something out of the 60s, and 1 to city property tax but I must pay 5 or 10 bills per month using checking. I'm old enough that I remember in the 90s writing like 10-20 checks per month, now I write like 5 per year LOL, I have two boxes of blank checks which absent the Singularity means I literally have a supply for the rest of my natural lifetime.

I don't even ... how do you ... so lets say you've got a prepaid VISA with say $15K to $20K added per month. OK. Now how does one pay rent when my bachelor pad only accepted checks? All that stuff, none of it accepts credit card payment. I don't even know how I'd pay my water bill. I could mail them a money order if I could get a money order using a VISA card but I don't think that's allowed. I sweep money to an investing account once in awhile and for better or worse the brokerage won't let you gamble by paying via credit card.

My local independent chain supermarket doesn't even accept credit cards because of processing fees, so I'd have to withdraw cash from the (pay) ATM then pay cash for my food, so I couldn't even directly pay for food. Or I'd have to buy all my food at the gas station convenience store which sells no produce nothing fresh, only cooked hot hot dogs and pop tarts, but does accept credit cards? The weekly farmers market is cash only.

How do those cards work in practice for adults with adult expenses? Being poor is apparently very complicated. I can't pay most of my bills with one of those cards, at least not as I understand how they work.

Re: Walmart's effort to get customers to build up their savings accounts

#199

Kind of fucked up that the article doesn't mention the fees associated with these cards until like 3/4 of the way into the article. These cards charge 5 bucks a month, plus like 3 dollars to deposit cash, 3 dollars to withdraw cash, in addition to the 5-10 dollars up front for the card itself. Because of this, a person using this type of card can easily spend $100+ a year on fees. Not exactly a great way to save mone…

If at all possible, people in this sort of situation would be much better served by joining a credit union.

I was under the impression that most people using these cards were using them because:

a) They distrusted banks because of a prior history of being screwed by them, or

b) They were unbankable because of a ChexSystems report preventing them from being able to open a traditional bank account.

Is this not the case?

Re: Walmart's effort to get customers to build up their savings accounts

#200
post #199

Kind of fucked up that the article doesn't mention the fees associated with these cards until like 3/4 of the way into the article. These cards charge 5 bucks a month, plus like 3 dollars to deposit cash, 3 dollars to withdraw cash, in addition to the 5-10 dollars up front for the card itself. Because of this, a person using this type of card can easily spend $100+ a year on fees. Not exactly a great way to save mone…

If at all possible, people in this sort of situation would be much better served by joining a credit union. I was under the impression that most people using these cards were using them because: a) They distrusted banks because of a prior history of being screwed by them, or b) They were unbankable because of a ChexSystems report preventing them from being able to open a traditional bank account. Is this not the case…

Regarding point "a", credit unions are specifically not banks. They have a separate legal structure.
Post reply on HN