Live data from Hacker News

My year with a distraction-free iPhone

medium.com

181–189 of 189 posts

Re: My year with a distraction-free iPhone

#181
post #153

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Richard Stallman, as usual, was quite ahead of the curve on this topic when he noted that he didn't carry a cell phone of any kind because of the privacy considerations associated with logging your location, accurately with triangulation, against cell towers. The instant you start using a cell phone consistently, you've effectively handed over a log of your location history to whoever can convince the sysadmin in you…

> ... as usual ... If you wonder why people don't listen to you, phrasing like this comes across as condescending, and that you have some sort of belief that Richard Stallman is infallible.

It's a trope (Richard Stallman was right, as usual), that I was intentionally paying homage to. Genuinely sorry if it annoyed you that much, certainly wasn't my attention. I really have no feelings one way or another towards Stallman, other than being amused at his hit rate on these type of predictions that people mock him for.

Re: My year with a distraction-free iPhone

#182
post #151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How do you know how many times I have pulled the phone out of my pocket and fat fingered a hang up? Lets not resort to speculation because it doesn't happen to you.

Nor anyone I've ever seen use a smart phone. I'm just playing the odds. Seriously, if you can't pick up a call much more than half the time, get a different dialer. And I think you and I both know you're carrying this too far.

You are making a hell of a lot of assumptions about me based on a comment.

Re: My year with a distraction-free iPhone

#183
post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A stripped-down smartphone has quite a few advantages over a dumbphone. Notice which apps are installed: Google Maps, subway maps, Rdio, Uber, Instacart. As he says, these things are like living in the future.

Regarding maps: is there an app that lets you save out Google Map info offline? I'd like to be able to type in a city and have it save all the data. I was thinking of having my setup just be a dumbphone plus a wifi-only tablet. The tablet would have utility apps, including this offline-map app. I'd just need it when I'm lost or need to find something nice to eat. It should also have Yelp data on it, and have the abil…

You can cache maps in google maps for android.

https://support.google.com/gmm/answer/3273567?hl=en&rd=1

Re: My year with a distraction-free iPhone

#184

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've rightgraded from smartphone to flipphone, and am mostly happier for it. There are a few exceptions, the principle one of which is transit apps -- NextBus and its kin are life changers when it comes to using and really being able to rely on public transit (and that's even though the apps and their interfaces still suck in many, many ways). It turns out that there is a minimal Web interface to the one transit app…

NextBus also has text message interface. http://www.nextbus.com/wirelessConfig/sms.jsp

Thanks, that's very good to know.

Re: My year with a distraction-free iPhone

#185

The guy just bought the wrong phone. Nokia 1100 could save him a lot of money and bring a life changing experience - the monochrome screen! I kid you not. And it has superior battery life.

If you want an elegant feature phone, I'd recommend the Nokia 515. It's sleek, has 1 month standby time, 5 MP camera, decent antenna/speakerphone, send/receive texts, basic email functionality and ultra-basic web access. It's the perfect "sensible" phone and was designed to fill that need:

http://www.nokia.com/global/products/phone/515/

Re: My year with a distraction-free iPhone

#186
post #182

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nor anyone I've ever seen use a smart phone. I'm just playing the odds. Seriously, if you can't pick up a call much more than half the time, get a different dialer. And I think you and I both know you're carrying this too far.

You are making a hell of a lot of assumptions about me based on a comment.

I count precisely 1, but ok.

Re: My year with a distraction-free iPhone

#187

I used to work for a mobile company, I used to get new phone every other week, it drove me crazy... Now I carry no phone with me at all. But I don't go around telling people that I am better than them, because I have no phone or that I have a "distraction" free iPhone, an iPhone is still a hell of a distracting gadget.

Funnily enough, your comment comes off as more self-righteous and more of a humble brag than the original article.

Yes, I realised it myself as I was typing my remarks. But this is third time I have come across this guy and his experiment.

Re: My year with a distraction-free iPhone

#188
post #11

As someone who owns a dumb flip phone, it's funny to read someone's enthusiastic account of their life-changing experience of... living exactly the way I do. But on the other hand, I get it. This sort of thing (facebook, hacker news, freaking imgur ) sucks up so much of my time (albeit on the desktop), and for what? Occasional interesting tidbits, and frequent annoyance and frustration? Some of it is straight-up bad…

The common factor in all these time-sinks is not the phone, but it's the internet. I have a smartphone and although I could definitely live without it, the only thing I've done is disable data. Rather, I'm too cheap to pay for data. What difference does that make, you ask?

One, on messaging, people would use text to contact me or each other if they notice that WhatsApp/Talk message hasn't reached for a couple of minutes. And a call is very helpful to transmit high density info in short time.

Two, I can still use my very nice phone with a large screen to watch videos, read ebooks on the go like if I'm in a bus or something. The difference here is that these things are not infinity-sinks in my experience - I can go 1 hour or so reading a book on a cellphone but then need to take a break which is when you look up and around. Also, subconsciously, the permanence of the book/video prioritizes real world interrupts (in an embedded programming context) rather than blocking them.

Then, you always have music that you can copy to the phone and listen to if you don't want to put your face to the screen. This enables you to move your head around everywhere and still not be all that bored because you still have that music going on.

If I absolutely want, which is almost never, I play games but I find that mobile games are not something that I like so it never comes up at all.

But a lot of time, I've just noticed myself looking around, just absorbing the world around me and being in my own thoughts rather than a forced stimulus and I find that relaxing unless I'm stuck in a very noisy environment in which case the earphone doubles up as a noise blocker.

And the general trend I've heard here is that you need to be on email. But work already has wifi and if you're at work your computer is right in front of you. Secondly, aren't you making a big mistake by configuring work email on your phone?

Maybe I'm the second coming of RMS but I do not install Facebook and Twitter apps on my phone for privacy reasons. Checking at most once everyday seems to be enough for me but I know that's not the case with everyone. It seems a lot of plans are made over fb for you guys, which is understandable - we use hangouts and whatsapp over here, but primarily whatsapp. But more importantly, for immediate plans we generally use SMS and phone calls which might be why we're not as reliant on facebook. FB is considered more of a public 'show-off' billboard than a private friend group.

So yeah, maybe this was worthy of its own blog-post but my gist here is that turning off the data does wonders. You still get to retain those handy unit converters, two factor authenticators, password wallets and other things that are yours without the Skinner box annoyances of the infinity-sinks.

Of course, before someone rants "You don't know how important it is to have internet on my phone", I'd say you're obviously right. However, maybe after reading my post, you realize that it isn't all that important then kudos to you. You should atleast try it once before knocking it right? A lot of times we think "It's impossible to get through without X" but humans are surprisingly adaptive and can cope without X just fine.

I'm just sharing my experience, hoping that it's useful to you.

Re: My year with a distraction-free iPhone

#189
post #166

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When people take the phrase: " Stallman was right, as usual." and suggest that this is a claim of infallibility. Overstating one's case doesn't win any new friends. The claim is that on these issues Stallman is more usually right than wrong. Do you have anything that suggests otherwise?

'As usual' is unnecessary unless you're trying to passively aggressively say "I told you so," or imply that people should blindly accept everything that Stallman says.

I usually avoid such comments, but: the only person in this thread criticizing Stallman is you. Did he tell you your dog was ugly once or something?
Post reply on HN