Live data from Hacker News

Untitled topic

news.ycombinator.com

181–190 of 223 posts

Re: undefined

#181
post #170

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What the hell is wrong with you? Do you act like this in person? Shut the fuck up, asshole. I mean seriously, I don't want to talk like that on HN, but just look at what he's saying.

Such comments wouldn't be hurtful-- or "assholish" to use your phrase-- if she didn't know she had done something wrong.

Perhaps God will take me over his everlovin' knee and spank my naughty, fornicating bottom when I die, but other than that, my life is looking pretty great from this side of the veil.

But thanks for asking.

Re: undefined

#182

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How the hell does consenting casual sex between adults relate to child molestation? Holy crap man, please seek lots and lots of therapy.

They're both deviant behaviors looked down upon by the mainstream for the permanent emotional harm they cause to the people involved.

You're insane. Please, please, seek therapy. You clearly have a brain but something terrible must have happened to you, and I'm sorry for that, but you need to find help.

You cannot equate "Would you marry an ex-child molester?" and "Would you marry someone who has had casual sex?"

Cannot.

CANNOT.

One raped a fucking child, dude. RAPED. A. CHILD. Another had a consensual relationship with another willing adult. You cannot and should not equate the two just because you happen to disagree with both. That is plain and outright creepy.

I hope you're a troll. Seriously.

Re: undefined

#183

Earlier quoted context omitted.

At least I didn't fuck up my life in the first year of high school .

How is my life fucked up?

Women who have casual sex have a way of not being able to get married, and many of them discover that it's something that they actually did want to do, eventually. Funny, that. Thus they spend their 40s breaking into tears every time a school bus passes by.

Re: undefined

#184
Facts and reason are all well and good, folks, but it pays to remember where they're coming from, and what agenda a person has.

Fact content enough does not counter the agenda of a person who is deliberately setting up a discussion for subversive means.

You cannot consider only what a person says for truthfulness, you must also consider why they are saying it, for intent.

I rest my case.

Re: undefined

#185

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How is my life fucked up?

Women who have casual sex have a way of not being able to get married, and many of them discover that it's something that they actually did want to do, eventually. Funny, that. Thus they spend their 40s breaking into tears every time a school bus passes by.

Quit your hyperbolic palaver and tell me, in observable facts, how my life is fucked up.

Re: undefined

#186
post #159

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But you have no evidence for any of this. It's just your personal theory. To me at least, it sounds highly dubious. In my experience most people do not act like that. Casual sex does not necessarily make people emotionally unstable. Alpha males do not need to become rapists. Nothing you say makes sense. And what on earth do you mean by "ladylike"? They are ladies, by definition they act ladylike. You live in a very s…

Alpha male "badboys" become rapists because they feel entitled to whatever they see. Mike Tyson's behavior in 1991 is an example of this: the man was rich and famous, but did it anyway because he was arrogant. A man who is successful in getting lots of casual sex stops seeing women as people, and starts seeing them as objects to be "acquired". At this point, bad behavior is likely to ensue. They are ladies, by defini…

noun 1. a woman

There, I looked the word up. It means what I thought it meant, ie, a woman. What did you think it meant?

Your views on "alpha male rapists", which apparently descend entirely from Mike Tyson, are ridiculous. That is a single data point and is utterly meaningless. Where's the rest of it?

I can personally attest to the fact that in contrary to your blanket statement, men who have been "successful" in "getting" lots of "casual sex" do not, in fact, stop seeing women as people.

You think you know everything, but you know nothing. I don't know who told you this crap, but they were utterly wrong. The sooner you realise this, the better.

Re: undefined

#187

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How is my life fucked up?

Women who have casual sex have a way of not being able to get married, and many of them discover that it's something that they actually did want to do, eventually. Funny, that. Thus they spend their 40s breaking into tears every time a school bus passes by.

You've already used that line. It wasn't funny the first time. However, the original was a bit more misogynist and even slightly sadistic: "i take pleasure in the thought of them ... sobbing"

Sex and the City bitches are disgusting. I hate to admit this, but I take pleasure in the thought of them spending their middle-aged years sobbing every time a school bus passes by.

http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=456292

another time management classic:

I still do look down, reflexively, upon any "profession" connected to real estate. I can honestly say I'd never marry a woman who worked in RE, and only a woman from a real estate family if she had been purified through an elite college

http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=449207

Re: undefined

#188
post #174

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're just jealous.

Trust me that I don't think anyone is jealous of a woman who lost her virginity at 14.

Are you even a man?

Any guy I know would think it is AWESOME to lose your virginty at 14.

Re: undefined

#189
post #170

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What the hell is wrong with you? Do you act like this in person? Shut the fuck up, asshole. I mean seriously, I don't want to talk like that on HN, but just look at what he's saying.

When a man talks on a public forum about "quality women" and the horrors of casual sex, this is pretty much always where it ends up. If, that is, you know how to poke them into revealing their true nature. Which I do. Now you see what I meant originally. :)

I stand corrected. I'll take your advice next time.

edit: Actually, I won't even respond next time - we were trolled, big time. I'm happy the post is being killed.

Re: undefined

#190
post #169

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I meant the book, not the review, but good call. Okay, another one: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1031259/Casual-sex... I can keep doing this, you know, given the enormous amount of research that's on my side.

Wow, both a Christian propaganda site and a trashy UK tabloid? It MUST be true! Peer reviewed study or nothing, please.

www.helenfisher.com/downloads/articles/17brokeheart.pdf

Pwn'd.

Post reply on HN