Live data from Hacker News

Smartphone makers don't bother to comply with EU repairability requirements

theregister.com

181–185 of 185 posts

Re: Smartphone makers don't bother to comply with EU repairability requirements

#181

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I'm not sure how to translate this to the smartphone market though. Fairphone and LaJolla seem to do well in this regard though so back to brand reputation for a lot of this. I'm not here with a silver bullet or anything, but I'd say the EU's energy efficiency labeling works well and has a fairly low level of being gamed/falsified. I don't think there's any big reason why the EU couldn't enforce labeling of a simil…

>> labeling of a similar kind to IFixit's repair-ability Because the public generally does not care one iota about repairability. Phones are more robust these days than ever. A fatal flaw like a screen break occures on the order of years. People just assume that, if something bad does happen, the phone will be out of date and/or no longer getting updates anyway. Many also get thier phones as part of a service plan an…

> Phones are more robust these days than ever.

They are certainly not more robust than ever. The trend of screen glass extending all the way to the edge of the phone and around it has ensured that most people need a case. Back in the 2010s I never used one and my phone would survive many drops.

Re: Smartphone makers don't bother to comply with EU repairability requirements

#182
post #97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Powerbank: Works with all phones, Doesn't require you to shut down and take your phone apart, Can be charged with a regular phone charger. Spare battery: ???

I would be more optimistic but I ordered some pretty solid power banks from Anker, which should be a top notch power bank manufacturer. Both types of products from them were recalled after about a month for being fire hazards. I imagine it's not universal but it really made me question the product category.

Just like external AUX-type-C DACs, manufacturers took a trivial feature of a smartphone and outsourced it to an array of disposable device vendors with questionable practices

Re: Smartphone makers don't bother to comply with EU repairability requirements

#183

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Screens generally break because you dropped the phone and you can take out have the components that way. But no matter what your battery is at 80 or 70 percent in 2 years. Power connectors are much harder to engineer to be replaced. Something has to connect at some point

Delete unused apps and set your phone to flight mode when not using it. This does wonders to your battery life. A 5 year old phone can last a week. Of course this doesn't work if you're expecting to receive calls or notifications.

What’s the point of having a phone then ?

I personally buy mid range phones for around 400$ and then buy new after 2 years.

Better than buying a 1200$ phone and expecting it to last 5 years

Re: Smartphone makers don't bother to comply with EU repairability requirements

#184

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Amazon... The company that looks like a medieval food shop with meat warming in the sun and a big sign that says "caveat emptor" and manned by a slave with very dirty hands. The fact that it still operates in the EU is prove that more tough punishments are needed for corporations that push fraud, dangerous products, abuse of monopolistic position, etc. Amazon in a nutshell.

A government can't ban a company for its reputation - it has to actually do something wrong.

> it has to actually do something wrong.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2026/apr/...

It is not reputation, it is committing actual crimes...

Post reply on HN