Live data from Hacker News

Darktable

darktable.org

181–183 of 183 posts

Re: Darktable

#181

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You are in good company. I went into Darktable enthusiastically and with willingness to learn its workflow. What I found was crippling bugs and a piss-poor UI. I've even gone back to it after a few years to see if I'd soften my stance, but nope: It blows. Part of my beef with it is discussed below; people are acknowledging that it sucks at organizing (and, I submit, browsing). But it purports to do it, so you waste t…

The lack of easy browsing is an issue, but Darktable has never purported to provide an image browser / organizer. Quite the contrary, the devs have always been crystal clear that they hate the concept with a fiery passion.

Did they specify why?

The lack of good open-source image browsers has, oddly enough, become a major problem. Only recently did someone float a pretty good one for Mac (FlowVision). I don't know what options there are on other OSes at the moment.

Re: Darktable

#182

I highly recommend people try out Capture One. After using Lightroom for years, switching to Capture One a few years ago felt like someone turned the lights on. Far and away the best photo and media mangement software I've ever used by at least two orders of magnitude, and reasonalbe license cost and generous free tier.

Capture One in my opinion has much higher output quality, better defaults, and specifically for supports Phase One backs better than anything else. I have not done a scientific study or anything comparing the outputs (maybe I should!), but it’s just really good at producing gorgeous photos. Media management though is IMO much worse than Lightroom? No keyword search, the catalog gets extremely slow over 10k images, an…

IMO Capture One is better suited to using separate catalogs. I usually create one per year or something similar. Having everything in one catalog is going to eventually get slow.

Re: Darktable

#183
post #86

I use Darktable a lot for 10 years. It has improved vastly over the years. I love the new additions like AgX! However I tried out the new AI denoise and it still isn't great. I also wish there was a way to manually correct barrel distortion (eg for vintage lenses) -- currently it only supports embedded metadata or lensfun profiles. I also find the OpenCL implementation to be rather slow. It would be better if it were…

[dead]
Post reply on HN