Live data from Hacker News

US and Iran agree to provisional ceasefire

theguardian.com

181–190 of 1001 posts

Re: US and Iran agree to provisional ceasefire

#182

Look, I'm glad we're pausing this. But I'd like to understand why an article on the pause shoots right to the top, but news of a tweet from the president indicating a plan to annihilate a whole country does not see a similar rise to the top.

It's too random a process to be precisely answerable about a specific data point or two.

One could argue that this is a doing-something as opposed to a saying-something, and thus more substantive. Or perhaps people want some good news to believe in? I don't know - one can make up lots of just-so stories about these things (see paragraph 1).

Re: US and Iran agree to provisional ceasefire

#184

Look, I'm glad we're pausing this. But I'd like to understand why an article on the pause shoots right to the top, but news of a tweet from the president indicating a plan to annihilate a whole country does not see a similar rise to the top.

Trump tweets insane things hourly. A reputable news organization announcing something actually happening with quotes from both sides confirming is news worthy.

Re: US and Iran agree to provisional ceasefire

#185

OK I guess it is pause time. US and Israel are probably restocking on whatever missiles they can get, while Iran doing the same, and Russian/China rushing stuffs to Iran through sea and railroad. At least I got a cheaper tank of gasoline tomorrow…

Gas won’t be any cheaper. While gas prices rise by the hour they take months to ever so slowly go down.

Re: US and Iran agree to provisional ceasefire

#186

We already attacked Iran twice during "talks," is there any indication that we mean it this time, or are we just going to bomb them again while negotiations are ongoing?

I have a Naive question, "why aren't the discussions related to public matters be telecasted live like a football match to the whole world? why isn't the public privy to the discussions about its own future?"

I mean...we have body cams for police..

Re: US and Iran agree to provisional ceasefire

#188
post #88

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Are Israeli concerns the axis around which the world must revolve? In any case they can keep busy ethnically cleansing south Lebanon and murdering Palestinian children.

Do you think only the Israelis are pissed about the Iranians funding the Houthis and Hezbollah?

The Saudis were at war with the Houthis for several years, Hezbollah assassinate Lebanese politicians and repeatedly starts wars that nobody else in Lebanon wants, which also includes intervening in the Syrian civil war on behalf of Assad and starving out Syrian villages. Ask the Syrians how they feel about Hezbollah.

Re: US and Iran agree to provisional ceasefire

#189

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

The fact that none of these were considered critical discussion points tells you just how desperate the US/Israel coalition is for a ceasefire. It really does feel like the rescue op was a failed raid on Isfahan, and this is the Plan B.

Why would the US be desperate for a ceasefire?

Re: US and Iran agree to provisional ceasefire

#190
post #30

"Iran's Supreme National Security Council announced that Iran has achieved a major victory, compelling the United States to accept its 10-point plan. Under this plan, the U.S. has committed to non-aggression, recognized Iranian control over the Strait of Hormuz, accepted Iran’s nuclear enrichment, lifted all primary and secondary sanctions, ended all Security Council and Board of Governors resolutions, agreed to pay…

But we've had messaging for domestic consumption worldwide since the trojan wars. What people say in either direction is not a reflection of what happens, it's what they want to say, and have some cohort believe happened. This is for domestic consumption. As will the WH reports be, facing the US domestic audience.

The Supreme National Security Council is quoting the agreement that Trump supposedly agreed to. And if that agreement holds, it is hard to see it as anything but a complete Iranian victory.

Keep in mind, the losers in a conflict have more of an incentive to lie than the winners. The US and Israel seem very much the losers here.

Post reply on HN