Earlier quoted context omitted.
We are still missing "Windows Subsystem for Copilot".
Never understood this about Windows Subsystem for Linux naming, nor its predecessor Windows Services for Unix. Surely Linux is the subsystem running on Windows? Should we now reinterpret Windows for Workgroups as a means of astrally projecting your organization inside Windows 3.11?! The dative only works ONE way, Microsoft! I guess they really just didn't want a product name to start with the name of a competitor's p…
How many products does Microsoft have named 'Copilot'?
181–190 of 406 posts
Re: How many products does Microsoft have named 'Copilot'?
#182Re: How many products does Microsoft have named 'Copilot'?
#183Earlier quoted context omitted.
We are still missing "Windows Subsystem for Copilot".
Never understood this about Windows Subsystem for Linux naming, nor its predecessor Windows Services for Unix. Surely Linux is the subsystem running on Windows? Should we now reinterpret Windows for Workgroups as a means of astrally projecting your organization inside Windows 3.11?! The dative only works ONE way, Microsoft! I guess they really just didn't want a product name to start with the name of a competitor's p…
Only in version 2. WSL1 didn't run a Linux kernel, just provided binary compatibility to run Linux userspace programs.
Re: How many products does Microsoft have named 'Copilot'?
#184Copilot does not know either but I'm sure the answer is a much bigger number then anyone would be comfortable with.
Re: How many products does Microsoft have named 'Copilot'?
#185The only Microsoft products I’ve actively heard people desire within the last 5 years are VSCode and Excel. Microsoft have so severely damaged their brand that they’ve finally shed the image of oddly gray Dell midtowers running XP on Pentium 4.
Re: How many products does Microsoft have named 'Copilot'?
#186Re: How many products does Microsoft have named 'Copilot'?
#187Earlier quoted context omitted.
We are still missing "Windows Subsystem for Copilot".
Never understood this about Windows Subsystem for Linux naming, nor its predecessor Windows Services for Unix. Surely Linux is the subsystem running on Windows? Should we now reinterpret Windows for Workgroups as a means of astrally projecting your organization inside Windows 3.11?! The dative only works ONE way, Microsoft! I guess they really just didn't want a product name to start with the name of a competitor's p…
Probably, but I doubt linux wants it either. People might think it's some official linux product.
Re: How many products does Microsoft have named 'Copilot'?
#188Earlier quoted context omitted.
Which is unusually simple. I would expect Google to use 10 more marketing names simultaneously without any logic to the product lines.
> Which is unusually simple. I would expect Google to use 10 more marketing names simultaneously without any logic to the product lines. I think they were lucky this time that they landed a good name after only a few iterations that has since stuck. Anyone remember Google Bard or LaMDA?