Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Claude Code Remote Control

code.claude.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

181–190 of 336 posts

Re: Claude Code Remote Control

#181

Post by MontyCarloHall »

EQmWgw87pw wrote: post #152
co_king_5 wrote: post #99

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[dead]

Tbh, after using it myself, I genuinely don’t see it writing code this buggy, so I don’t get what’s going on here

I'm willing to bet you don't full-on YOLO vibecode like the lead Claude Code developer, running 10 Claude Code sessions in parallel to push 259 pull requests that modify >40k lines of code in a month [0]? There is zero chance any of that code was rigorously reviewed.

I use Claude Code almost every day [1], and when used properly (i.e. with manual oversight), it's an amazing productivity booster. The issue is when it's used to produce far more code than can be rigorously reviewed.

[0] https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1px44q0/claude_co...

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45511128

Re: Claude Code Remote Control

#182

Post by short_sells_poo »

yoyohello13 wrote: post #165
amelius wrote: post #97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sounds like something that was vibe coded :)

I'm willing to bet most of their libraries are definitely vibe coded. I'm using the claude-agent-sdk and there are quite a few bugs and some weird design decisions. And looking through the actual python code it's definitely not what I would classify 'best practice'. Bunch of imports in functions, switching on strings instead of enums, etc. I had to downgrade to an earlier release because an update introduced a regres…

A few weeks ago the github integration was completely broken on the claude website for multiple days. It's very clear they vibe code everything and while it's laudable that they eat their own dogfood, it really projects a very amateurish image about their infrastructure and implementation quality.

Re: Claude Code Remote Control

#183

Post by max8539 »

I was just thinking about it two days ago - how nice it would be to use my local Claude code instead of the limited cloud version to make some ad hoc changes when I have a fresh idea on a hike. And two days later - here we go, a new release

Re: Claude Code Remote Control

#187

Post by gedy »

co_king_5 wrote: post #136
gas9S9zw3P9c wrote: post #126

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Does that mean more issues will show up soon?

[dead]

You jest but I was flabbergasted when doing some AI backed feature that the fix was adding a "The result you send back MUST be accurate." to the already pretty clear prompt.

Re: Claude Code Remote Control

#188

Post by bpodgursky »

Anthropic is spitting out software in 2 weeks that took enterprises 24 months to ship 5 years ago (and was still buggy AF, let's please actually think about all the vmware citrix enterprise trash you tolerated). It'll get hardened over the next couple weeks.

You all can pretend the software dev cycle hasn't changed... get real.

Re: Claude Code Remote Control

#189

Post by yosefk »

monkeydust wrote: post #163
fny wrote: post #93

This is an extremely clunky and buggy prerelease, so don't try to hot fix prod from the toilet without a different mobile frontend. Right now: - You can't interrupt Claude (you press stop and he keeps going!) - At best it stops but just keeps spinning - The UI disconnects intermittently - It disconnects if you switch to other parts of Claude - It can get stuck in plan mode - Introspection is poor - You see XML in the…

Struggled with it also, given up (for now). I thought coding was a solved problem Boris?

Coding is a solved problem. Problems with the code - these are far from solved, in fact they're multiplying, but coding is definitely solved

Re: Claude Code Remote Control

#190

Post by advael »

interestpiqued wrote: post #178
advael wrote: post #170

Weird all these companies struggle so much to support remote services, ssh has been working for me pretty seamlessly for like the 20 years I've been using it and has allowed me to remote-control any computer I own with relatively reliable authentication (with some hiccups that tend to be patched pretty rapidly when found) throughout that entire period. I hear tell it worked even before I was using computers professio…

Yeah but this is from an AI company so its mad different

Yea I've noticed that most things made by a company are worse and less reliable than things that are free and maintained by volunteers
Post reply on HN