Live data from Hacker News

Orchestrate teams of Claude Code sessions

code.claude.com

181–190 of 238 posts

Re: Orchestrate teams of Claude Code sessions

#181

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If it could do anything that a junior dev could, that’d be a valid point of comparison. But it continually, wildly performs slower and falls short every time I’ve tried.

I am way more productive with $200/month of AI than I would be with $5,000/month of junior developer. And it isn’t close.

What if you are going to spend 5400 either way, you go all agent or get an apprentice and an agent for them too.

Re: Orchestrate teams of Claude Code sessions

#182

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But it continually, wildly performs slower and falls short every time I’ve tried. If it falls short every time you've tried, it's likely that one or more of these is true: A. You're working on some really deep thing that only world-class expects can do, like optimizing graphics engines for AAA games. B. You're using a language that isn't in the top ~10 most popular in AI models' training sets. C. You have an opportun…

Trying to make a media player, media server, all by using ffmpeg and a pre-built media streaming engine as it's core. Python and SQLite. About a week's worth of effort every time until it begins to go too far off the rails to be reliable to continue to develop with. It never did get the ffmpeg commands right, I had to go back to crafting those by hand, it never did get the streaming engine to play in the browser's vi…

I'm curious which harness and which model(s) you've been using.

And whether you have a decent PRD or spec. Are you trying to prompt the harness with one bit at a time, or did you give it a complete spec and ask it to analyze it and break it down into individual issues with dependencies (e.g. using beads and beads_viewer)?

I'm not looking for reasons to criticize your approach or question your experience, but your answers may point to opportunities for you to get more out of these tools.

If you're using Claude Code and you have a friend who has had more success with these tools, consider exporting your transcripts and letting them have a look: https://simonwillison.net/2025/Dec/25/claude-code-transcript...

Re: Orchestrate teams of Claude Code sessions

#183
post #170

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I think LLMs make me at least 10% more effective I know this was last year but... https://metr.org/blog/2025-07-10-early-2025-ai-experienced-o...

I don’t need external research to validate or invalidate my own experience.

I think it depends on the tasks you use it for. Bootstrapping or translating projects between languages is amazing. New feature development? Questionable.

Re: Orchestrate teams of Claude Code sessions

#184
post #98

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not like he was the only one who came up with this idea. I built something like that without knowing about GasTown or Beeds. It's just an obvious next step https://github.com/mohsen1/claude-code-orchestrator

Exactly! I built something similar. These are such low hanging fruit ideas that no one company/person should be credited for coming up with them.

Seriously, I thought that was what langchain was for back in 2023.

Re: Orchestrate teams of Claude Code sessions

#185

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don’t need external research to validate or invalidate my own experience.

I think it depends on the tasks you use it for. Bootstrapping or translating projects between languages is amazing. New feature development? Questionable.

New feature development in web and mobile apps is absolutely 10% more productive with these tools, and anyone who says otherwise is coping. That's a large fraction of software development.

Re: Orchestrate teams of Claude Code sessions

#186

Earlier quoted context omitted.

At this point, if you're paying out of pocket you should use Kimi or GLM for it to make sense

These are super slow to run locally, though, unless you've got some great hardware - right? At least, my M1 Pro seems to struggle and take forever using them via Ollama.

Try this https://unsloth.ai/docs/models/qwen3-coder-next

Re: Orchestrate teams of Claude Code sessions

#187

This is great and all but, who can actually afford to let these agents run on tasks all day long? Is anyone here actually using this or are these rollouts aimed at large companies? I'm burning through so many tokens on Cursor that I've had to upgrade to Ultra recently - and i'm convinced they're tweaking the burn rate behind the scenes - usage allowance doesn't seem proportional. Thank god the open source/local LLM w…

[flagged]

Re: Orchestrate teams of Claude Code sessions

#188

This is great and all but, who can actually afford to let these agents run on tasks all day long? Is anyone here actually using this or are these rollouts aimed at large companies? I'm burning through so many tokens on Cursor that I've had to upgrade to Ultra recently - and i'm convinced they're tweaking the burn rate behind the scenes - usage allowance doesn't seem proportional. Thank god the open source/local LLM w…

[flagged]

Need it be actually disjoint? Interested in learning about the limitation here because apparently the agents can coordinate.

Otherwise what’s the difference between what they are providing vs me creating two independent pull requests using agents and having an agent resolve merge conflicts?

Re: Orchestrate teams of Claude Code sessions

#189
post #184

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Exactly! I built something similar. These are such low hanging fruit ideas that no one company/person should be credited for coming up with them.

Seriously, I thought that was what langchain was for back in 2023.

Seriously, what is langchain? It’s so completely useless. Clearly none of the new agents care about it or need it. Irrelevant.

Re: Orchestrate teams of Claude Code sessions

#190
post #170

Earlier quoted context omitted.

$200/month is peanuts when you are a business paying your employees $200k/year. I think LLMs make me at least 10% more effective and therefore the cost to my employer is very worth it. Lots of trades have much more expensive tools (including cars).

> I think LLMs make me at least 10% more effective I know this was last year but... https://metr.org/blog/2025-07-10-early-2025-ai-experienced-o...

Honestly, that is a “skill issue” as the kids these days say. When used properly and with skill, agents can increase your productivity. Like any tool, use it wrong and your life will be worse off. The logically consistent view if you want to believe this study and my experience is that the average person is hindered by using AI because they do not have the skills, but there are people out there who gain a net benefit.
Post reply on HN