Earlier quoted context omitted.
void means it's not legal and it's more or less as if the text there where just void/blank you can't violate a void clause in TOS or a contract so you can't get a ban/termination for violating a void clause they still can decide to not do business with you, after providing all service you already payed for and that is _if_ you can decide to not to business with individuals without providing a reason, in certain situa…
> so you can't get a ban/termination for violating a void clause > they still can decide to not do business with you What's the difference? > in countries where such a clause is valid/not-void, you very well can be sued for using Claude Code to work on/develop e.g. Open Code... Has anyone in any country ever got successfully sued for violating ToS terms like these? Try to read any ToS and think that average use doesn…
yes, less private people but definitely companies
> What's the difference?
e.g. YT had been forced to reinstate (and not shadow ban) channels in the EU multiple times because judges ruled that terminations did not had legal basis and they don't have the right to arbitrarily refuse doing business with the people in question (for various reasons, including but not limited to it being clearly a retaliation for suing for right you have. Through the market dominant position of YT also played a non negligible role there).
Or in other words, by itself it might not mean much but in combination with other laws, especially iff claude code because the marked dominant AI editor.