That these are banned but Chinese made robot vacuums and other appliances are not points to this not being about protecting individual Americans and more about protecting national interests (drones can map out terrain in a lot more detail and are mobile outside of your bedroom, and can be trivially weaponized)
The U.S. Government Just Followed Through on Its Ban of DJI Drones
181–190 of 331 posts
Re: The U.S. Government Just Followed Through on Its Ban of DJI Drones
#182Earlier quoted context omitted.
Most of the money "given" to Ukraine was older stockpiled weapons that were approaching EOL or at least "refresh cycle" anyway and needed to be replaced. Instead of throwing it away or selling it, they gave it to Ukraine, and most of the actual money spend went to US armaments companies. The price tag you quote is the same as the "an $X value thrown in for free" you see in "deals" from shady companies.
We have neither the money (see national debt) nor production capacity (see 155mm shells, missile production, howitzer barrels, etc) to give billions away for somebody else’s war. Furthermore, the weapons had a cost when they were new, and replacing them now carries a higher cost. Saying the price tag is fictional is like saying my dinner is free because the steak was already in my fridge.
Re: The U.S. Government Just Followed Through on Its Ban of DJI Drones
#183Earlier quoted context omitted.
I haven't kept up to date but does the US have that much more leverage over Canada anymore? Last I checked we have tariffs on most exports, including crude, wood, steel and aluminium (probably missing a bunch). General goods are tariff'ed at 35% while China is tariff'ed at 47.5%. They could get us to ban DJI for sure but I'd assume it'd be more through carrot than stick, because at this point we've been pretty consis…
The threat of invading is hard to beat.
Canada being the only country to successfully invade the US
or did I mix up my pronoun references again?
Re: The U.S. Government Just Followed Through on Its Ban of DJI Drones
#184Earlier quoted context omitted.
Less drones for you, more for the military. There is no real downsides for the current gov’t here.
I build hobby scale drones for fun, mostly sub250g micros with no military value. I’d pay more for domestic parts, because I think the capability is strategically valuable, and the quality of Chinese stuff is super variable. There’s basically no industry here because the aliexpress parts are so cheap, so I support some protectionism, understanding that it will make the hobby more expensive. I think you’re probably ri…
Re: The U.S. Government Just Followed Through on Its Ban of DJI Drones
#185Earlier quoted context omitted.
They're hard to develop . That is proven by the fact that DJI is by far the industry leader, and everyone else is trailing. We're not talking about duct-taping a Go Pro to an OTS drone.
They don't need to be that hard to develop. It's not like you need a return to base feature. Sort of like wanting to learn how to fly a plane, but not take off and land the plane. You don't need to have the full feature set of a DJI drone to make it a weapon. You also don't need to worry about the battery life of coming back, so you've essentially doubled your distance capabilities, so maybe a stronger radio. Do you…
DJI drones aren't being used as weapons platforms in the US...
They're being used for industry (agriculture, real estate, land surveillance, fire monitoring)
No one gives a shit that it's not difficult to make a flying grenade. They care that all the features you're in here mouthing off about as "not important" are actually important.
Re: The U.S. Government Just Followed Through on Its Ban of DJI Drones
#186Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ah yes I'm sure it has nothing to do with the drones running closed proprietary software via OTA updates, with encrypted data connections back to China, while being outfitted with 8k cameras, gps, lidar, etc.
Reading the article, it actually doesn't. Many US-made drones are also banned.
Re: The U.S. Government Just Followed Through on Its Ban of DJI Drones
#187So unless I'm reading this incorrectly, DJI can keep selling existing models forever in the US? The US just can't get updated versions of drones?
Re: The U.S. Government Just Followed Through on Its Ban of DJI Drones
#188Earlier quoted context omitted.
Source? Tfa says only new models of drones are banned.
You're correct. The ban targets the supply chain and future imports/sales, not retroactive possession. New foreign drones cannot be certified for sale in the US market going forward. Existing drones you already own aren't being confiscated or made illegal to fly
Re: The U.S. Government Just Followed Through on Its Ban of DJI Drones
#189Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
They did murder a woman, but I agree that one murder is far short of a civil war. Even understanding that a single murder can be the spark that starts a fire, I don't think we're even close to that kind of scenario (contrary to the hyperbolic rhetoric which has become normalized from both sides over the past 10ish years.)
Re: The U.S. Government Just Followed Through on Its Ban of DJI Drones
#190Earlier quoted context omitted.
I build hobby scale drones for fun, mostly sub250g micros with no military value. I’d pay more for domestic parts, because I think the capability is strategically valuable, and the quality of Chinese stuff is super variable. There’s basically no industry here because the aliexpress parts are so cheap, so I support some protectionism, understanding that it will make the hobby more expensive. I think you’re probably ri…
Where is the ban of cheap motors, escs, cameras, radios from aliexpress? How does this affect hobby drone market at all?