Earlier quoted context omitted.
would his policy have been to pay for GLP1s? Yes. And is that a little more than a hypothetical? yes. People who don't know US budgets don't know what drives faster-than-GDP growth in expenses (it's real estate, biotech and college).
> People who don't know US budgets don't know what drives faster-than-GDP growth in expenses (it's real estate, biotech and college). That's just wrong. Social Security, Medicare, debt interest, and the military eclipse everything else. Discretionary spending outside the military is only like 15% of the budget. Also, why are you even connecting GLP1 drugs and the 90s federal budget surplus? The drugs didn't exist bac…
The drugs could have existed back then. You’d have to read the link. And today they do, and under Clinton, would he pay? All great things to talk about.
I am trying to have an interesting conversation and instead it’s just, downvote this downvote that.