Live data from Hacker News

What if tariffs?

swatch.com

181–190 of 286 posts

Re: What if tariffs?

#181
post #114

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wish there was simple three strike policy on any elected official. Three proven lies and they are remove from office for life. And these can be anything. And not knowing at time does not change it. Only silence or absolute truth should be accepted.

lol. just last week he posted that the Canadian ad showing the audio recording of nixon against tariffs was fake.

Reagan, not Nixon

Re: What if tariffs?

#182
post #179

Earlier quoted context omitted.

100%. I'm excited to find somewhere not playing disco and skater boy, and instead supporting their local music. Hell, here in the UK I'm happy to hear Sheeran even though he's not really my style typically. I don't mention that because I like American cultural dominance, merely because it is so ubiquitous. I was in the middle of South Africa in the oughts and there were bootleg Britney Spears albums... Kind of shocki…

Avril Lavigne (singer of "Sk8er boi") is Canadian.

Fair enough. It popped to mind because I just heard it.

After looking it up, I found it was produced and recorded in California, by an American label.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sk8er_Boi

Re: What if tariffs?

#183
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Like, seriously and not just Swatch. I wanted to buy myself a watch that would look good. Ended up with nothing because good looking watch dont seem to exist.

Are you disliking the big honking watches with like 3 subdials? I don't like those either. I lean to the minimal style, so I recently got one from Obaku. The one I got is technically in their women's line; women's watches tend to be simpler, and I have small wrists so women's watches tend to fit me better. Skagen also makes nice minimal stuff. I also sometimes dig around used watch forums like WatchUSeek. You can fin…

Actually, yes, those are much better. And yes "big honking with three dials" is good description of the issue.

Thank you.

Re: What if tariffs?

#184

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can you expand on what you mean exactly? I see these sentences like your littered throughout reddit, vague notions of violence/war?

It was a common argument that ultimately all of the constitutional protections, balance of powers and all that were protected by the Second Amendment - that in the face of losing their liberty, Americans would rise up against an authoritarian government. Within this administration, a lot of people feel that there has been an assault on constitutional protections, but the people who trumpeted the Second Amendment as b…

It was also avoided for decades as "vile" and now the groups that could most use the 2nd Amendment are (mostly) unarmed.

Re: What if tariffs?

#185
post #135

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not sure it's all that new. During the Bush Jr. years America was not highly thought of. I'm an American traveling through Scandinavia and Northern continental Europe for the last three weeks, now in the UK. I haven't experienced a bit of grief. Their opinion of our politics is generally separate from how they treat me personally, and I do the same for people of other nationalities. American cultural dominance is…

> Their opinion of our politics is generally separate from how they treat me personally, and I do the same for people of other nationalities. That is such a sane thing to do. I was always astonished and sad how often strangers in foreign countries instantly link my origin to the actions of the people in power. As if this is completely under my control and with no doubt I support and approve whatever they do.

[flagged]

Re: What if tariffs?

#186

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This was a big worry initially when the tariffs were announced but it doesn’t actually seem to be happening. Most manufacturers are not adjusting their price structure because the effects are super hard to estimate (don’t forget that the US is still just 20% of worldwide demand)

This might have been true three months ago, but it isn't any more. Narrow margin business like independently owned coffee shops are already seeing consumables increase in price by up to 3x, which then leads them to have to add "tariff surcharges" that show up on their POS devices.

The profit margin on selling brewed coffee is normally counted in thousands of percent. Any tariff on the imported coffee beans does not have any noticeable effect on operating costs of a coffee shop, so you can safely assume that the owners are just lying in order to jack up their prices, which might work depending on customer base.

Operating costs for coffee shops mainly come from other things than the beans, such as rent, utilities, wages.

Re: What if tariffs?

#187

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What options do Canadians have? Deal with the wildly capricious economic policies of the US president, or go seeking other, more stable opportunities elsewhere? Almost all countertariffs we have in place are targeted as opposed to the sweeping tariffs Trump is implementing.

They could seek other opportunities elsewhere without adding tariff themselves: continue to import from the US and other countries like before. They may indeed export less to the US due to reduced demand from the US, but reciprocating the tariff won't help with that.

But the point is to hurt producers of other country, to motivate them to argue to their government about original tariffs.

There are no winners in the trade war.

Re: What if tariffs?

#188
post #113

Earlier quoted context omitted.

To simplify: if the exporter lowers their price, the consumer pays the same, the exporter gets less, and the consumer pays the tariff to the government. If the exporter charges the same price, the consumer pays more, the exporter get the same as before, and the consumer pays the tariff to the government. The consumer always pays the tariff. The exporter never pays the tariff.

Please pretend that the exporter hypothetically pays the tariff. It just changes who is paying who. The end result is the same.

We don't have to pretend. We know who's paying. It's the consumer/importer.

Re: What if tariffs?

#189

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Let's imagine, hypothetically speaking, that demand is perfectly inelastic. The price of a good is $10, and buyers will absolutely refuse to pay more than $10 under any circumstances. Before a tariff is imposed, the seller sells the good for $10 and keeps $10 in revenue. If a tariff of $1 is imposed under these hypothetical circumstances, does the buyer pay more? Does the exporter get paid the same as before? Clearly…

The other thing that happens is that a buyer doesn't buy anything at all. Deadweight loss.

Sounds like he made America great again - people can't afford the food they like anymore.

Re: What if tariffs?

#190
post #175

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> In both cases the consumer is paying price + tariff. Consumers pay all of the operating costs and taxes of a company. That's not the debate. With tariffs, the cost of an imported product becomes higher than a domestically produced product, making consumers purchase the domestically produced product. This is the purpose. The long-term purpose is that foreign companies start making their products in your country to a…

> The long-term purpose is that foreign companies start making their products in your country to avoid tariffs and be able to compete. There is no long term in the US anymore. TACO flip flops every few days, based on who he spoke to last.

Trump didn't invent tariffs.
Post reply on HN