Earlier quoted context omitted.
> But I would also say that communism doesn't even look good on paper. It looks terrifying! To naive and frankly clueless young minds with no appreciation of human nature, human society, and so on, a superficial acquaintance with the subject matter might seem nice, as it might play on tropes and juvenile grievances, envies, and sentiments. But an honest look at it by an intellectually properly formed and informed min…
If you're too lazy to read the linked encyclical, just say so. Don't hide behind vacuous moralizing.
Open Source is one person
181–184 of 184 posts
If you’re too lazy to make your own argument, just-- well you already said so.
Re: Open Source is one person
#182They stopped before looking at the number of commits by person in the projects with multiple maintainers. I would guess that makes the picture even bleaker.
Re: Open Source is one person
#183I feel like there's a lot of misunderstanding of this issue in the software community, because primarily, supply chain risk isn't a software or engineering issue. It's a governance issue. Someone doesn't have to be a bad actor for a project to have supply chain risk. Nor do all who evaluate supply chain risk have the same security posture and evaluate risks the same as others might. The DoD likely has a very differen…
Still, we had a lot of security issues of people injecting themselves into these one-man projects.
It is ridiculous to force these people to do anything because you were to lazy to build the foundations of your infrastructure yourself, especially if you care about self-reliance.