US AI Action Plan

Post by DrewADesign » Thu, Jul 24, 2025, 1:13 AM UTC

Thrymr wrote: post #54

> Many of America’s most critical sectors, such as healthcare, are especially slow to adopt due to a variety of factors, including distrust or lack of understanding of the technology, a complex regulatory landscape, and a lack of clear governance and risk mitigation standards. A coordinated Federal effort would be beneficial in establishing a dynamic, “try-first” culture for AI across American industry. I'm sure "mov…

Post by tonymet » Thu, Jul 24, 2025, 1:21 AM UTC

tonymet wrote: post #85

soulofmischief wrote: post #72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think a term yet exists for the practice of putting your name all over documents and media with such frequency that cleanup during following administrations takes several years, undermining and delegitimizing the new administration for your followers in the process. Some kind of sick soft power move that I expect we will be seeing a lot more of.

[flagged]

Post by dwaltrip » Thu, Jul 24, 2025, 1:29 AM UTC

andsoitis wrote: post #150

baron816 wrote: post #67

> We need to build and maintain vast AI infrastructure and the energy to power it. To do that, we will continue to reject radical climate dogma > This initial phase acknowledges the need to safeguard existing assets and ensures an uninterrupted and affordable supply of power. The United States must prevent the premature decommissioning of critical power generation resources Yeah, they're going to do all they can to b…

> Yeah, they're going to do all they can to block cheap renewables and give handouts to fossil fuel companies. Many AI people in positions of influence have argued that AI will all but solve the climate crisis. Viewed from that angle, it would make sense that you wouldn’t care about how dirty the sources of energy is on the way to AGI because once there, the climate crisis will be magically solved. Somehow.

Post by dotancohen » Thu, Jul 24, 2025, 1:31 AM UTC

sorcerer-mar wrote: post #119

giantg2 wrote: post #81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

AI for treatment is rightfully scrutinized. AI for billing or other administrative tasks could be a big cost saver since administrative costs are a huge expense and a major factor of high consumer costs.

Here’s how this is working in practice: There’s a fast-growing cottage industry of companies using AI to figure out how to bill insurers “better” And there’s a fast-growing cottage industry of companies using AI to figure out how to deny claims “better” I see no reason to expect improvements to the patient or provider experience from this. A lot more money spent though!

Post by yoyohello13 » Thu, Jul 24, 2025, 1:33 AM UTC

mlsu wrote: post #46

In the energy section, they talk about using nuclear fusion to power AI... but not solar. What a joke.