Live data from Hacker News

My new deadline: 20 years to give away virtually all my wealth

gatesnotes.com

181–190 of 704 posts

Re: My new deadline: 20 years to give away virtually all my wealth

#181

"virtually" wonder why it needs to be qualified like this.

Because there will probably be enough left at the end that for most would be wealthy beyond their richest dreams.

It's hard to get by with only 1.08 billion dollars…

Not that I think giving away most of his money isn't admirable. But I think he'll still qualify for "he died rich".

Re: My new deadline: 20 years to give away virtually all my wealth

#182
post #141

One of the great tragedies of the world is that while he is arguably the philanthropist with the highest positive impact in human history, a significant part of the population seems to still think he is the literal Antichrist.

This statement is so 90s and so BOFH-centered that it is irrelevant to a level of stupidity. Gates has done a lot to prove he's not a cold-hearted mf and compared to all the bros in their prime at the moment, dude, just think of Elon or Larry Ellison, well our man Billy is really very much a bright persona.

[deleted]

Re: My new deadline: 20 years to give away virtually all my wealth

#183
post #100

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> without paying capital gains tax. It's a funny day when you're feeling charitable, but go out of your way to avoid helping the entity that should be the ideal charitable recipient.

That assumes a lot about the current administration.

Presumably the current administration is what has made the day funny (in a sad way).

Re: My new deadline: 20 years to give away virtually all my wealth

#184
post #109
post #92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can't he be both?

I think he is both. Maybe you need to do some evil before you can do some good, because the general evil does whatever necessary to win in competition, and that is challenging. He would have never got the money he has if he didn't do that.

We could also decide to live in a society that doesn't allow for such runaway wealth consolidation we need the robber barons' hand-outs to do good. C'est la vie.

Re: My new deadline: 20 years to give away virtually all my wealth

#185
post #85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, it's not as if the public sector is solving many problems these days. We seem to have decided, collectively, that we'd rather have more problems. At least that's what we've been voting for.

Well, consider how our voting priorities would change if billionaires had less of an impact on elections? Would we be where we are today if, for example, Musk couldn't spend over a quarter billion dollars influencing the 2024 election?

the rich have always impacted elections through advertisements, campaigns donations, etc.

Re: My new deadline: 20 years to give away virtually all my wealth

#186

Remember when Gates refused to lift IP restrictions on the COVID vaccine https://www.wired.com/story/opinion-the-world-loses-under-bi...

There were, I think, fair reasons to do this. A patent-free "people's vaccine" may well have reached fewer people because there's got to be money in scaling up the production of something like this.

Re: My new deadline: 20 years to give away virtually all my wealth

#187

One of the great tragedies of the world is that while he is arguably the philanthropist with the highest positive impact in human history, a significant part of the population seems to still think he is the literal Antichrist.

> a significant part of the population seems to still think he is the literal Antichrist.

Beware that you don't fall into the trap of thinking the 1% of the population that makes 90% of the noise on the internet is "significant" or a representative sampling of the population. Most everyone else's views are quite boring and detached from extremism, they just don't shout their moderation on the rooftops.

Re: My new deadline: 20 years to give away virtually all my wealth

#188

>The Gates Foundation’s mission remains rooted in the idea that where you are born should not determine your opportunities. Arguably he's already done so much for billions of people. Had typing on computers not became the main way businesses communicate , anyone with bad, handwriting would be stuck in menial work. When I was growing up in the 90s my hand writing was so bad it was assumed I would never amount to anyth…

Why would bad handwriting be a barrier to success? I'm asking honestly. After all it's a trope that doctors have terrible handwriting, and typewriters and word processors have been around for ages. Also, talking from experience bad handwriting can easily be improved by paying a bit more attention to what you are doing and some practise.

Re: My new deadline: 20 years to give away virtually all my wealth

#189

It’s too bad this guy turned into one of the bigger fear mongers during Covid times. He was one of the main pushers of the whole “New Normal” narrative and his doomsday prognostications did significant damage to society and generally went completely against every value he claimed to have. But hey, people like him got a free pass to spit whatever nonsense came out of their mouth as long as it was pro-doom. Good news w…

It's 1999 over again. The whole world was panicking that all the computers would blow up over the Y2K problem. Which mostly didn't happen because we spent billions fixing the problem. Were the doomsayers wrong?

Re: My new deadline: 20 years to give away virtually all my wealth

#190

One of the great tragedies of the world is that while he is arguably the philanthropist with the highest positive impact in human history, a significant part of the population seems to still think he is the literal Antichrist.

No billionaire will ever be a net positive to society. The wealth he accrued was literally stolen from the labour of millions of people. No token donations at the end of your life will ever remediate that situation.

>> The wealth he accrued was literally stolen from the labour of millions of people.

It's such a weird take I don't even know where to begin. Are you suggesting that all people who worked at Microsoft to make Windows and IE and all their other products had their labour "stolen" from them? If yes, can you expand on that?

What do you do for a living? Do you perform some kind of a job that you get compensated for? If yes, do you also feel like you're being stolen from?

Post reply on HN