Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is there any offering you think should be blocked? Or do you think everything should be allowed? Child porn, disinformation attempting to destabilise a democracy, …?
Are you seriously saying he‘s a child predator because he thinks the EU poisoning DNS is bad? And are you actually equating child abuse with “disinformation attempting to destabilize a democracy”? What democracy? What disinformation? What relevance does either of these things have to do with some guy not paying money to watch football?
I really don’t understand how my comment can be interpreted like this in good faith.
I asked if parent doesn’t think that there might be urls that should be blocked, for example sites serving child porn.