Earlier quoted context omitted.
What a weird take. Arresting someone for reporting a major security vulnerability is pretty shitty thing for a state to do. What you're suggesting is that that's not actually that bad. Same sort of logic that leads to people getting arrested for looking at HTML and reporting that it includes passwords.
> What you're suggesting is that that's not actually that bad. When did I ever say or imply that? I agree that intelligence agencies are draconian, but to imply that you'd be locked away (never to be heard from again) for pointing out that a substation could be bombed and cause power issues is ridiculous.
So, I guess I really don't understand your point. That being arrested for pointing these things out isn't bad because it's not being disappeared?