We are the "thin blue line" that is trying to keep the code high quality

Post by account42 » Mon, Feb 17, 2025, 4:27 PM UTC

o11c wrote: post #88

paulddraper wrote: post #78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Bro, just don't rob CVS

Also don't ever jog down the street. In fact, don't even sleep inside your own home!

Post by account42 » Mon, Feb 17, 2025, 4:41 PM UTC

Gigachad wrote: post #20

ysofunny wrote: post #3

why cannot more people learn about git and branching you want your merges in? patch it in your own branch the real crux of the issue is the quality of " the offical version", the real issue, then, is about official branding. I remember back in the day there were multiple kernel versions by different mantainers.... then again I'm probably missing the forest for the trees or something

Because forked kernels is how we ended up with all those SBCs which could only run some ancient version of linux. If you can't mainline it, you are committing to maintaining a fork forever, and the more changes you require, the more maintenance that fork will be. The Linux kernel quite intentionally makes maintaining a fork a pain in the ass to pressure vendors to mainline their drives. But now mainline maintainers a…

Post by account42 » Mon, Feb 17, 2025, 4:45 PM UTC

NewJazz wrote: post #108

ecshafer wrote: post #94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Do you bring politics into the workplace when it is not relevant?