Live data from Hacker News

Google-Wiz deal fizzles out, company will pursue IPO

cnbc.com

181–190 of 288 posts

Re: Google-Wiz deal fizzles out, company will pursue IPO

#181
post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yup the world is big and even though we think we have heard stuff, there are more things beyond that. For example, I know a dev who makes mobile apps and clears 500_000 / month in profit and yet their app isn't really "popular". It is crazy.

Huh, cool. What sector is the app in, what are some other interesting (non-identifying) aspects of the app that stand in contrast to revenue? Is that in ads, or does the app have in-app purchases et al?

The only way to make that much of money is with dating apps, IMHO. There’s a million out there and some of them make really good money in certain niches.

Re: Google-Wiz deal fizzles out, company will pursue IPO

#182

Fun fact: > Wiz was founded in January 2020 by Assaf Rappaport, Yinon Costica, Roy Reznik, and Ami Luttwak, all of whom previously founded Adallom > Adallom was founded in 2012 by Assaf Rappaport, Ami Luttwak and Roy Reznik, who are former members of the Israeli Intelligence Corps’ Unit 8200 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiz_(company)

8200 veterans are highly sought after, and you can probably get a blank check from any VC if you have that on your resume.

Re: Google-Wiz deal fizzles out, company will pursue IPO

#183
post #151

I was like "how the f* is a website builder possibly worth $23B" and then I realized Wiz is not Wix. And then I realized Wix has a market capitalization of $9B, and I'm still WTF.

Wix has over $1.5B annual recurring revenue, so a market cap of $9B makes sense. You and I might not use them, but it is a real business, not just a hype bubble.

My non-IT wife is using wix for her homepage. She loves it, I never heard of it before. 9B sounds okish.

But wiz? There are reading like Mossad/Unit 8200. And who wants to have them in their backend? Worse than Cloudstrike, which sounds like CIA to me.

Re: Google-Wiz deal fizzles out, company will pursue IPO

#184

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Im afraid its been 25 not 15 years since 1999 ;(

Whoosh… that's the entire point you missed right there.

… what was the point? I missed it too!? VCs returns looking like power law investment in the back end / mud on wall in the front end of a fund?

Or that the author has been waiting for VC investment to stop? I don’t understand what he’s trying to suggest.

Re: Google-Wiz deal fizzles out, company will pursue IPO

#185
post #178
post #162

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They certainly have resources to expand into that if needed

It is an entirely different problem with almost nothing in common with their existing product, and there are a ton of incumbents, some of whom are even quite good (Carbon Black, SentinelOne, etc)

There were quite a few of those when CrowdStrike entered there is always room there.

Re: Google-Wiz deal fizzles out, company will pursue IPO

#187

I was like "how the f* is a website builder possibly worth $23B" and then I realized Wiz is not Wix. And then I realized Wix has a market capitalization of $9B, and I'm still WTF.

Fun fact: both founded by Israelis and have their R&D centers in the country.

Re: Google-Wiz deal fizzles out, company will pursue IPO

#188

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think that's including their current Wiz holdings?

I thought they meant the founders were already billionaires before founding Wiz...

Not billionaires, but all together already sold a company to Microsoft at age 30, and are not the avg Joe.

Re: Google-Wiz deal fizzles out, company will pursue IPO

#189

>Wiz’s founders previously built security startup Adallom, raised money from Sequoia and Index and sold the startup to Microsoft for $320 million in 2015. Copy, Paste and ask for 70 times more?

Totally different business, problem and solution. You should read abit before commenting like that.

Re: Google-Wiz deal fizzles out, company will pursue IPO

#190

Earlier quoted context omitted.

AD is fairly well known due to its relationship with LDAP and Kerberos. Samba can act as an AD DC.

AD is incredibly more popular than Kerberos despite part of it using the protocole. Microsoft is everywhere in the corporate world and most people know of AD but have never heard of neither LDAP nor Kerberos. And to be honest, it's fairly understandable. AD manages to be somewhat turnkey while doing the same thing on Linux systems is a major pain.

What is the usual way of doing this on Linux systems?
Post reply on HN