Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's well-known the total environmental impact is much less for plastic than glass. Just the weight alone should allow you to understand this [0] [1] [2]. Glass is not recyclable widely. It is a contaminant in single-stream recycling because broken glass is a hazard for sorting, and even if you are able to recycle it, the transport costs are extremely high [3]. [0] https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20230427-glass-or…
I like how you completely ignored the environmental impact of microplastics and PFAS.
Heinz’s sustainable ketchup cap
181–190 of 472 posts
Re: Heinz’s sustainable ketchup cap
#182Re: Heinz’s sustainable ketchup cap
#183Sustainability talk being about ketchup caps while rich people fly to climate conferences in their yachts. Weird world.
Apart from that, yes. Do they not realise that their hypocrisy makes their supposed engagement for the 'climate' and 'planet' null and void? Probably not or possibly they imagine they'll have enough money and power to force their ideology down the throats of the general population.
Re: Heinz’s sustainable ketchup cap
#184Earlier quoted context omitted.
> What a mess. Nothing compared to https://www.google.com/search?q=landfill+plastic&tbm=isch
Plastic trash is supposed to be burned or recycled
Re: Heinz’s sustainable ketchup cap
#185Earlier quoted context omitted.
> fly to climate conferences in their yachts. Weird world. Yachts that fly. Weird world, indeed :)
Its a reference to this meme format: https://www.reddit.com/r/me_irl/comments/11ayxqc/me_irl/
Re: Heinz’s sustainable ketchup cap
#186Sustainability talk being about ketchup caps while rich people fly to climate conferences in their yachts. Weird world.
Re: Heinz’s sustainable ketchup cap
#187Sustainability talk being about ketchup caps while rich people fly to climate conferences in their yachts. Weird world.
"We can't do everything, therefore we should do nothing". This kind of thing is just content-free dismissal.
Re: Heinz’s sustainable ketchup cap
#188All the rest is a very marginal reduction unlikely to have an effect in the long run.
In a complex environment, where we can't make predictions, is better to be cautious.
Re: Heinz’s sustainable ketchup cap
#189Earlier quoted context omitted.
Plastic is essentially a byproduct of fuel production. My understand is that a lot of companies will pay others to take that plastic off their hands. Not only is it cheaper to use plastic than glass, it's positively subsidised.
A realtor friend found a lucrative side business in plastic recycling during the Great Recession. She still makes around $100k a year off of it. I wish I knew how it worked but her and her business partner don’t talk about it much. Probably for good reason. Pretty sure they take plastic off people hands and sell it to someone who uses it, paid to take it away and then paid again by a buyer.
It’s basically crude oil when it comes to energy/kg.
Lots of shipping containers going back empty to lots of places.
Re: Heinz’s sustainable ketchup cap
#190Very nice. I live alone and often I'm baffled by the sheer amount of garbage that my urban lifestyle generates. I was not alive in the 80's but I was told that people used to use more environment-friendly packaging like glass bottles. Sometimes I wonder why this massive change to everything-should-be-packed-in-plastic happened.
Your lifestyle does not generate garbage. Companies that sell non recyclables and non compostsbles generate garbage. Why hasnt cocacola replaced their plastics with something compostable? There are new inventions for replacing plastics out each day, I wonder where those inventions end up.
If soda drinkers cared about plastic consumption, they would switch to anything that has glass containers and spend more - or just cut the habit due to the waste generated. But that's not happening.
Sure, there can be political will to force Coke to switch to something else - bypassing the need for the customer to do anything - but that would result in higher prices which makes people mad. Good luck asking a politician to do something that will upset their constituents