Earlier quoted context omitted.
GPT-4 doesn't fail anything here, it's just worse than humans. Maybe I was unclear but I'm not claiming that GPT-4 is as good as the median human in any task.
I appreciate the clarification, although I was linking this as clearly ConceptARC has a number of tasks where GPT-4 fails badly compared to humans. On "Extend To Boundary" category GPT-4 scores 0.2 and humans score 0.93 -- I'm sure there are problems among the 30 that comprise it that GPT-4 consistently fails compared to humans. And that is what you asked for in your parent comment: a task that it fails consistently…
https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.09196
Also, how the data is presented matters a lot. Currently, LLMs handle the benchmark much better presented linearly in 1 dimension