Live data from Hacker News

Jury Finds Realtors Conspired, Awards Nearly $1.8B in Damages

wsj.com

181–190 of 282 posts

Re: Jury Finds Realtors Conspired, Awards Nearly $1.8B in Damages

#181
post #44

Good for them. On the list pointless middlemen, they’re definitely at the top. One of the dumbest parts of the real estate commission scam is purporting the lie that “the seller pays the commission”. Anyone with half a brain knows that if money is coming out of a transaction, it’s a transaction cost being eventually passed onto the buyer.

[deleted]

Re: Jury Finds Realtors Conspired, Awards Nearly $1.8B in Damages

#182

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Remember there’s no professional responsibility for realtors, so they do shady shit like shop the house internally to keep the full 6%.

I encourage you to report any behavior you believe to be illegal or unethical to both your local realtor association as well as your state agency. That’s why those organizations exist and we are all better if people are held to professional standards.

Is there a practical way to diligence theoretically unethical behavior?

Re: Jury Finds Realtors Conspired, Awards Nearly $1.8B in Damages

#183

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Just sell it / or buy it yourself. It isn't hard by any stretch. You can use a $200 listing broker on a MLS site. That is the big secret. Then it gets on zillow,redfin, etc automatically.

I agree with this sentiment, and I'm especially in favor of selling where you purchase services "a la carte" (e.g. pay a fee for a real estate attorney, a separate one to the escrow company, photographers if needed, etc.). However, if you say "it isn't hard by any stretch", I invite you to take a look at listings in your area and compare for-sale-by-owner listings with those listed by an agent. Half the time it looks…

We sold our first home with some help of a FSBO service. I think it was $1,500. They wrote the property description (and passed it by me), created the 3d virtual tour which in my experience gives an amazing preview on whether the house would work for a buyer and would be worth visiting, listed it on their site and zillow, and for another $300 would provide an attorney to facilitate the closing.

I agree most FSBO pictures are awful. We were happy to pay for a service to help the listing look polished, and we firmly believe we got more money/closed faster because of it. With 7% interest rates on a 30 year mortgage, it would take about 5 years of payments to accumulate 6% equity to pay the commission to sell the house, before accounting for other fees (and appreciation).

We ended up paying effectively ~0.8% for the FSBO service and 2.5% to the agent representing the buyer. The agent was apprehensive, but the buyer really wanted our house. Everyone acted in good faith after the hail storm a few weeks prior to closing and everyone was happy as far as I could tell.

Re: Jury Finds Realtors Conspired, Awards Nearly $1.8B in Damages

#184
post #172
post #106

The problem isn't just realtors, it is that the whole system is designed to maximize transaction costs. Who cares how much the attorney and loan paperwork cost when they are only 1-2%, you are already paying 5-6% to realtors, ~.5-1% in repair costs, and often a part of the buyer's closing costs too? But if you think about that wholistically, that means sellers are paying 8-10% of the cost of a house every time they s…

The problem is 'buying agents'. Looks totally bonkers from over here (UK, I think it's foreign to at least most of Europe too).

Yes, this is where the collusion comes in. Many seller agents will simply ignore buyers without a buying agent.

Re: Jury Finds Realtors Conspired, Awards Nearly $1.8B in Damages

#185

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Your list of “mind-boggling” items all seem extremely reasonable to me. Your city and neighbors don’t want to be responsible for or have to deal with your house falling down because it was improperly constructed. And having lived in neighborhoods with septic systems most of my life, a little neglect can go a long way. Unless you’re building in the middle of nowhere (far from anything labeled a “city”), there are obli…

> Your city and neighbors don’t want to be responsible for or have to deal with your house falling down because it was improperly constructed. Why on earth would the city or the neighbors be "responsible" for that?

Depends on the specific thing, but generally it's because there might be consequences to doing things poorly that would spill onto your neighbors, or which might cost the local government money to fix after it hurts or kills you. It's the same kind of reason that laws requiring motorcycle helmets or seatbelts exist.

The sewer one is obvious, since it could be a public health issue -- if you screw it up you could wind up contaminating local water sources (or just stinking up the area). Issues with the lumber you use, or with your building plans, could potentially result in your house collapsing in such a way that it might damage your neighbor's property. And getting a new permit if you take too long is probably just a way to force you to check in and make sure that you're not deviating from the earlier plans you filed.

Re: Jury Finds Realtors Conspired, Awards Nearly $1.8B in Damages

#186
post #176

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Dumb, uninformed question here, but are there not some sort of For Sale By Owner systems that cut into the huge percents in closing costs? Or is the issue that you have to pay the buyers' realtor fees too and that's unavoidable? I'm trying to figure out why nobody's figured out "DIY MLS listing as a service without having to pay for a realtor". Maybe everyone who does this just gets a realtor's license or something.

I’m not a realtor but I considered selling my home myself once. Two issues I hit immediately: 1. I could not list the home in MLS as That system requires annual fees to use and you need to have a realtor license. 2. You still need to pay the purchasing side’s realtor otherwise they will simply not consider your home for their clients. That’s 3% that’s hard to get any lower. I ended up negotiating my realtor’s selling…

> 1. I could not list the home in MLS as That system requires annual fees to use and you need to have a realtor license.

Additionally, if you were to decide to list "For Sale by Owner" and market it yourself, you can submit it to the major aggregators (Zillow et al), but their contracts with the MLS systems often disallow them from mixing MLS and FSBO listings in the same search result set, so the FSBO listings are hidden behind a toggle or something and go unseen by the great majority of people browsing.

Re: Jury Finds Realtors Conspired, Awards Nearly $1.8B in Damages

#187
post #106

The problem isn't just realtors, it is that the whole system is designed to maximize transaction costs. Who cares how much the attorney and loan paperwork cost when they are only 1-2%, you are already paying 5-6% to realtors, ~.5-1% in repair costs, and often a part of the buyer's closing costs too? But if you think about that wholistically, that means sellers are paying 8-10% of the cost of a house every time they s…

Dumb, uninformed question here, but are there not some sort of For Sale By Owner systems that cut into the huge percents in closing costs? Or is the issue that you have to pay the buyers' realtor fees too and that's unavoidable? I'm trying to figure out why nobody's figured out "DIY MLS listing as a service without having to pay for a realtor". Maybe everyone who does this just gets a realtor's license or something.

It's true that there's scope for an alternate MLS that's just for sale by owner listings. But as someone else mentioned, the buyer often uses an agent (I refuse to use the made-up word "realtor") and you'll have to pay that fee anyway. Unless, that is, your listings site provided handholding to do away with the buying agent. To handle the paperwork, a notary and/or a lawyer is necessary but the site could either provide those services for cheap or detailed instructions on how to proceed if you want to use your own notary/lawyer. It's simple enough. It turns out that the main function of a real estate agent is to simply ferry paperwork back and forth between the clients and the lawyers. You can just as easily do this yourself (we did and saved a lot).

Re: Jury Finds Realtors Conspired, Awards Nearly $1.8B in Damages

#188
> For several years NAR has been fending off accusations by U.S. antitrust officials and private litigants that it has conspired to keep home-sale costs high in the face of major technological upheavals. This verdict is by far the group’s biggest setback yet.

Buying or selling a home involves paying numerous middlemen thousands of dollars without having a clear idea what value they are providing in the process, except that if you don't pay them, you can't pay the next person in the line. Burn that whole industry to the ground as far as I'm concerned.

Re: Jury Finds Realtors Conspired, Awards Nearly $1.8B in Damages

#189
post #147

Commission based on home value is a joke. Realtors should earn a flat-rate.

I have always been wondering what kind of work a realtor needs to do for selling/buying a $100M mansion and ended up with $5M commission…

Nepotism, same as every other million-dollar job.

Re: Jury Finds Realtors Conspired, Awards Nearly $1.8B in Damages

#190

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I encourage you to report any behavior you believe to be illegal or unethical to both your local realtor association as well as your state agency. That’s why those organizations exist and we are all better if people are held to professional standards.

Is there a practical way to diligence theoretically unethical behavior?

Parsing the question as:

- a broker with a client who is selling

- to pitch buying to another broker who has a client who is buying

- and for the brokers to work for the same company

I don't think so? It sounds obviously ethical

Post reply on HN