Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

AI real-time human full-body photo generator

generated.photos

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

181–190 of 421 posts

Re: AI real-time human full-body photo generator

#181

Post by ThrowAway1922A »

stavros wrote: post #156
mrguyorama wrote: post #131

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Looking at the poses, it feels optimized for generating porn, but one example someone showed had a child's face (good god please don't let your "AI" system generate child anything if you want to sell it for porn purposes), and another user noted that their attempt error'd out because it "detected nudity", even though other users get given a nude model by default.

[flagged]

> What exactly is the argument against AI-generated child porn?

Currently? The fact that all the models need training data and the law will see that as victimizing the people who were used in the data set be they adults of children.

Overall? The fact that it's disgusting and pedophiles deserve things which I can say IRL and everyone agrees with, but on HN will get me banned.

Many countries ban underage anime porn too. Children and their likeness are off limits.

Re: AI real-time human full-body photo generator

#184

Post by joshgachnang »

phyzome wrote: post #114
bdowling wrote: post #7

> “If you want to use images produced by Human Generator in commercial projects, contact us.” If there is no copyright in AI-generated images, then how can they possibly enforce this?

As of now, copyright of AI-generated images is not a settled matter . But I think smart money is on the courts coming down on the side of copyright being applicable. (If you're thinking of the recent court case, no, that was unrelated; some guy was trying to pull a stunt and the court did not actually rule on the thing you think they did.)

Do you have a link or something re: your second point for those of us who might not know?

Re: AI real-time human full-body photo generator

#185

Post by Icons8 »

endisneigh wrote: post #31

Not bad at all, but what’s the main use case? The site lists all of these things you can do, but are those things people needed or wanted? Is the idea to replace stock photography of people?

Stock photography, better selfies, or simply fun. Also, people always invent some use creators never thought about.

Re: AI real-time human full-body photo generator

#186

Post by bunnybender »

the8472 wrote: post #83
anigbrowl wrote: post #81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm surprised browsers don't offer something like Docker so that each site is isolated to its own virtual environment.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/temporary-con...

The creator and maintainer of that extension has passed away in January.

https://github.com/stoically/temporary-containers/issues/618

Re: AI real-time human full-body photo generator

#187

Post by ShamelessC »

gwern wrote: post #129
nbardy wrote: post #68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You’re overstating the simplicity of a scaling a GAN well. GigaGAN is the best quality out of those and requires 7 loss functions and is incredibly complicated. Sure GANs can scale, but Diffusion models are drastically easier to scale.

No, I'm not. BigGAN did fine on scaling up to JFT-300M with basically no changes beyond model size and a simple architecture. This is also what we were observing, even with a buggy BigGAN implementation. GigaGAN is the best quality, but that's mostly because it's also the biggest; as Table 1 shows most of the gains come from various kinds of additional scaling. (And this is moving the goalposts from the usual asserti…

> Diffusion models are only 'drastically easier to scale' because researchers have spent the past 3 years researching pretty much nothing but diffusion models

This is what tends to happen when you find a superior method.

GAN’s are fine, they have plenty of promise for tasks requiring rapid inference. But diffusion models beat GANs on robustness and image quality every time.

Re: AI real-time human full-body photo generator

#188

Post by wizofaus »

blitz_skull wrote: post #160
stavros wrote: post #156

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Probably moral depravity if I had to guess. Not sure why we even need “an argument” against it. It’s pretty self-evidently wrong.

What if it turned out it were the only effective way to prevent people engaging in real paedophilia?

Re: AI real-time human full-body photo generator

#189

Post by dublin »

gwern wrote: post #9

If you're wondering how it's so fast and cheap and they can generate variants so easily, it's because they're using GANs (see the footer). GANs are way faster than diffusion models because they generate the image in a single forward pass and their true latent space encoding makes editing a breeze. (And if you're wondering how it can look so good when 'everyone knows GANs don't work because they're too unstable', a wi…

How it can look so good? ROFL!! It just created a guy with a hand coming off his left ankle in place of a foot, and toes or fingers or something poking out the end of the show on his right foot! https://generated.photos/human-generator/64e682308448b8000c5...

Re: AI real-time human full-body photo generator

#190

Post by jrflowers »

jeroenhd wrote: post #175
jrflowers wrote: post #153

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That was after several Barbie dolls. Great website.

The prompt for the image you linked says "in sims world". It's in the bottom left field.

That’s cool, I got there through hitting the refresh button.
Post reply on HN