Live data from Hacker News

X, the moonshot factory

x.company

181–190 of 198 posts

Re: X, the moonshot factory

#181

Yes, X as a brand lacks uniqueness. Xbox X factor X-men Xvideos Etc etc Seems to me musk just loves the domain. Domain: $10,000,000 Users: $44,000,000,000

Well, of course he does: his first start-up he managed sold (well, not exactly sold) to Confinity was called X.com [0]. And yes, it had image problems because people thought it was a porn site judging by its name. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X.com

[deleted]

Re: X, the moonshot factory

#182
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

mac os x 10 is actually a pretty special number

I suspect the "X" branding for these companies has less to do with Roman numerals and more to do with the prominent use of "X" in mathematics as a unknown variable, and that's due to René Descartes according to: https://hsm.stackexchange.com/questions/8109/why-are-x-and-y...

There’s also a history of using ‘X’ as the designation for eXperimental planes, e.g the X-15.

I always assumed that was the inspiration for the use in tech branding like Google X - conjuring up images of skunkworks, etc.

Re: X, the moonshot factory

#183

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The Xbox brand is very unique because they think numbers go from 0 to 360 to 1.

They do over the domain 360*Z_719

If it's supposed to be degrees, then since 360==0 doesn't that mean the range is [0,360) so 360 degrees is actually an out of range value for an angle?

I've always wondered this but never enough to ask it.

Re: X, the moonshot factory

#184

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The main JFK speech about the manned moon landing was May 25, 1961, before a joint session of Congress. The “we choose to go to the moon” speech at Houston’s Rice University in the fall of 1962 was more a case of pumping up public enthusiasm about the very expensive program, given that polls — especially in that mid-term election year — were showing growing doubts among voters that the expenditure was worth it.

Thanks for the clarification. So it’s more like 9 years than 8.

Apollo 11 landed on July 20, 1969, so just over 8 years after the main speech at the joint session.

Re: X, the moonshot factory

#185
post #154

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Musk's original web payments company was x.com, which he started in the late 90's. Then it did a very early merge with some other startup, and the combined company rebranded to PayPal. At some point, Musk bought back the domain from PayPal. I do not understand why anyone would think that it's a great idea to do a this major rebranding of an existing company with a well-known brand.

This entire endeavour not sure whether conscious or unconscious is Musk trying to -- gosh, there's a word for this but my English is failing me -- to finally get even with Thiel, to show Thiel he can do everything Thiel did but better. Someone like Musk never fully recovers from getting fired from his dear X.com post-merge. Make no mistake: back then Musk was doing a stupid by trying to force a Windows tech stack on…

> gosh, there's a word for this

one-upmanship?

Re: X, the moonshot factory

#186
post #180

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, it was. It was a political program to gain reputation against the Soviets and phenomenally successful in that I think the US was happy with its ROI.

Reputation isn't revenue . You could say the same thing about Brain or Waymo.

The USG isn't setting out to make money on major ventures. Publicly traded companies are.

Re: X, the moonshot factory

#187

Everyone is hating on "X" right now because of the bloviated way tech companies talk about "changing the world". I'm always pessimistic about things like this too, but I do have a soft spot in my heart for this stuff. Why?, because it allows some engineers to work on cool stuff. Will it pan out, probably not, but I'm not going to cry if Google blows through a few million bucks. They won't even notice it. Better that…

These engineers won't be having fun, because these engineers will be working for Elon Musk. Also, it's a rebrand. He fired the vast majority of the engineers he had. Everyone is hating on "X" because the people who possess the ability to think critically, i.e. engineers, are rightfully perplexed by every single move that this moron makes. It taps into the uncanny valley response for smart people, and it is amplified…

Wrong X

Re: X, the moonshot factory

#188
post #81

Why is every rich asshole obsessed with “X”? Disgraced Uber CEO/founde (“TK” — within his inner circle, douche alert lol) with inserting X into their products Twitter randomly renamed to “X” by Elon Tesla car with X Google has some X product, probably. I think their R&D dept is just named “X” Apple had a brief “X” and “XS” phase with their iPhones (instead of just using 10 or 10S)

F** everything, we're doing five X's!

Re: X, the moonshot factory

#189

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Brain is everything you know of today in GenAI space, and many more internally used products and technologies.

Has google landed anything from AI yet? Bard just launched and it may be a $100B product in a few years, but now it’s still playing catch-up to OpenAI (that started without any moonshot and “only” with $1B in its first major seed round [0]). [0] https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/openai

All SOTA generative models are built on Google Brain’s research.

Re: X, the moonshot factory

#190
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

mac os x 10 is actually a pretty special number

I suspect the "X" branding for these companies has less to do with Roman numerals and more to do with the prominent use of "X" in mathematics as a unknown variable, and that's due to René Descartes according to: https://hsm.stackexchange.com/questions/8109/why-are-x-and-y...

hmm:

mac os: numeral

generation: variable

google: eXperimental!

malcom: variable

elon: hey yo, check it out i tried to register x.com and actually got it!

the question is... chitter or xitter?

Post reply on HN