Live data from Hacker News

SEC asks for emergency order to freeze Binance US assets anywhere in the world

cnbc.com

181–190 of 294 posts

Re: SEC asks for emergency order to freeze Binance US assets anywhere in the world

#181
post #5

Once again the use-case for crypto turns out to be... large scale criminality and fraud. Shocker.

or the US government is just afraid of not being able to easily track all monetary transactions legal and illegal. Big brother needs to see all in order to control all.

crypto makes things much easier to track

Re: SEC asks for emergency order to freeze Binance US assets anywhere in the world

#182

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't know what "discourse" you are talking about. I've been reading about crypto on hacker news before bitcoin hit one dollar. Other than r/buttcoin and yahoo groups, this site has been one of the most anti crypto places you can visit, to the point of being an absolute embarrassment. It has been a lesson to me about humans and intelligence since that time. Still love the place though, but I learned never to let co…

Could it be that a tech savvy community like hn largely understands the implications of, the actual utility of and can see through the hype of crypto currency? I would put my money on hn understanding crypto currency over any other community. It should probably be a red flag to true believers that hn is generally suspicious of it.

Imo, it's the opposite. I just think HN's anti-crypto sentiment just hows how "normie" this community is.

Re: SEC asks for emergency order to freeze Binance US assets anywhere in the world

#183

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I take issue with something about crypto "causes us to lose our minds?". Couple points: 1. At this stage of the game, there is not a lot new under the sun to discuss that is likely to alter people's opinions. I would say that I did think there were some good comments in some of the other posts about what constitutes a security by the legal definition, and helped me understand better the specific points of the SEC's a…

Which boils down to the fact that it's entirely rational to be negative about crypto. Crypto is interesting as a kind of libertarian pseudo-oppositional secular religion that flatters itself that it's edgy and non-conformist but is actually dead-centre mainstream in a capitalist culture with consistent shades of criminality dedicated to making money at any cost.

And that applies to everything except for Bitcoin. Otherwise we’re just telling fairytales.

Re: SEC asks for emergency order to freeze Binance US assets anywhere in the world

#184

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've certainly experienced that. Depending on the complexity of the replies, I'll either reply to everyone or choose one of them to respond to.

Yeah I’ve experienced it myself, and am aware that I am often on the other side too… It’s debilitating to have people throwing their 2c in to a growing tree thread and bounce! At least with linear vbulletin forums of old people would have to scroll past the conversation or look like idiots when they reply something totally out of context.

I think we've all done it at some point. It's usually a low hanging fruit phenomenon. Someone posts something with an obvious mistake, lots of people notice it and proceed to point it out at nearly the same time. Between refreshes of the page, it looks like you're the first one replying. Most vivid memory I have of this is someone here inadvertently telling the creator of the D programming language he didn't know enough C to comment.

> At least with linear vbulletin forums of old people would have to scroll past the conversation or look like idiots when they reply something totally out of context.

Alternatively, they'd recreate threads via extensive quoting, leading to massive in-line quote trees... Socializing is a messy affair no matter what we do, I guess.

Re: SEC asks for emergency order to freeze Binance US assets anywhere in the world

#185
post #182

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Could it be that a tech savvy community like hn largely understands the implications of, the actual utility of and can see through the hype of crypto currency? I would put my money on hn understanding crypto currency over any other community. It should probably be a red flag to true believers that hn is generally suspicious of it.

Imo, it's the opposite. I just think HN's anti-crypto sentiment just hows how "normie" this community is.

Why do you think that the people that understand the technology generally have a negative view about it? Are "normies" just dense? Or do you think everything is based on jealousy?

What community that wouldn't have confirmation bias would understand crypto currency better? And what are their thoughts on it?

Re: SEC asks for emergency order to freeze Binance US assets anywhere in the world

#186
post #10
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

“a” use case that is indistinguishable and unquantifiable from use cases you respect which is a major difference from “the” use case and just a use case for that company, which in any other industry we would talk about the company’s behavior not the entire asset class and industry, I find it disingenuous to have that “use case” auto reply on any article that happens to be about crypto but is really about a company

That was an "ok" argument maybe 5-8 years ago, now there's too much evidence that no legitimate use case exists, and every alleged one turns out to be a fraud or a get-rich-quick scheme.

BTC has been around since 2008. Today in 2023 BTC is like $27k. Does the longevity, ubiquity, price and liquidity of BTC fit the pattern of a useless get rich quick scheme? Has any such scheme existed this long, despite so much scrutiny and hostility, based on hype and confidence alone?

If no useless speculation scheme has ever thrived as long and as much as BTC, and it keeps on going, at what point do you have to ask if your opinion just doesn't fit with reality?

The shady exchanges and shitcoins muddy the waters but have fundamentally nothing to do with BTC and a handful of other top cryptos.

Re: SEC asks for emergency order to freeze Binance US assets anywhere in the world

#187

Earlier quoted context omitted.

By that revisionist version of events, every other bank should also have failed by now.

The government created a special guarantee for all depositors precisely to prevent runs on banks. JP Morgan was granted a special waiver to buy FRB. It’s pretty obvious that what happened was that SVB and FRB management teams were set up as scapegoats to save face while the government worked in the background to halt the sector from unwinding. I happen to agree that this was the right thing to do.

I don't see how you can call them scapegoats and that someone else is "saving face". That implies someone else did something wrong, and they're taking the blame for it, so someone else doesn't look bad. What is that and who is that someone?

The management of SVB and FRB gambled and lost. They have no one to blame but themselves. Events that followed seemed like reasonable steps to take to clean up their mess.

Re: SEC asks for emergency order to freeze Binance US assets anywhere in the world

#188

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The problem IMHO is that it is so well-known that HN hates crypto that anyone who wants to voice a reasonable opinion is likely to avoid doing so in order to not get piled on with downvotes, hatred, etc. - At least for me that's it, it would be stressful to deal with that so I go elsewhere to discuss the technology. And this is probably precisely how an echo chamber can be created even without recommendation algorith…

> anyone who wants to voice a reasonable opinion is likely to avoid doing so in order to not get piled on with downvotes, hatred, etc I think refraining from posting due to fear of downvotes is a massive disservice to HN. People should be exposed to views of all kinds. It wouldn't be very interesting if we all agreed. I actively try to post and reply even when downvoted. In the course of doing so I often discover tha…

Downvoting tells you, that this kind of comment is not something the community wants. Of course, I'll avoid posting such comments.

I'm not going to evangelize for seeing other positions, when the majority seems to prefer one-sided views.

Re: SEC asks for emergency order to freeze Binance US assets anywhere in the world

#189
post #182

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Could it be that a tech savvy community like hn largely understands the implications of, the actual utility of and can see through the hype of crypto currency? I would put my money on hn understanding crypto currency over any other community. It should probably be a red flag to true believers that hn is generally suspicious of it.

Imo, it's the opposite. I just think HN's anti-crypto sentiment just hows how "normie" this community is.

On the contrary. "Normies" were very positive about crypto, mostly because they were used by the crypto people from the early days, as fodder for their various get-rich-quick scams.

The "anti-crypto sentiment" that was the unwavering average sentiment on HN is, to me, a point of pride, and I'm thankful for it, because it inoculated me when I was most vulnerable - early on, where it wasn't obvious yet what type of people are promoting crypto and for what reasons.

Re: SEC asks for emergency order to freeze Binance US assets anywhere in the world

#190

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't know what "discourse" you are talking about. I've been reading about crypto on hacker news before bitcoin hit one dollar. Other than r/buttcoin and yahoo groups, this site has been one of the most anti crypto places you can visit, to the point of being an absolute embarrassment. It has been a lesson to me about humans and intelligence since that time. Still love the place though, but I learned never to let co…

I'm convinced if the internet was created today, most of HN would be faxing each other, decrying it as a scammers wasteland and useless technology..

Yes, if we had the previous Internet to go on.

It's a sobering moment when you realize that a lot of tech is actually net negative to you - not the least because it outsourced to you the work that previously was done, much more efficiently, by specialized labor.

Post reply on HN