Here's a weird idea. Bundle materials into tuition expenses. It incentivizes the right people with the power and market participation to optimize for the right thing. Presumably, teachers and departments would have to justify costs from a materials budget to an admin forcing real downward pressure on the textbook market. The current state of textbooks acts like a surprise fee(dark pattern) where you purchase a produc…
> Here's a weird idea. Bundle materials into tuition expenses. As a former textbook seller, professors will exploit this for profit by publishing their own textbook at inflated prices and collecting a nice reward. This does happen in some places (or did, I'm out of the industry). Imagine if every state or country developed their own open source curriculum, instead of allowing publishers to exists as owners and gateke…
1) There is no best book for a subject. What suits a class in Elementary Statistics in one place or program might be all wrong for another.
2) There's a lot more to developing texts (or, as you say, curriculum) than people think. Besides a book, there are exercises and answers to the exercises. There are in class slides, perhaps programming components, and the elephant in the room is integration with the most popular LMSs. And all this has to be kept up to date.
It really requires money. At least in the US, I'm unaware of funding.
I'm an Open Text author so I'm sympathetic to your thoughts but it proves to be complex, IMHO