"Yes things other than SSH occasionally show up" Like what?
Brute.Fail: Watch brute force attacks fail in real time
181–190 of 268 posts
Re: Brute.Fail: Watch brute force attacks fail in real time
#182Earlier quoted context omitted.
They're impotent little weasels who couldn't hit a target the size of a barn, so the risk is minimal.
"do not guess that it will be your weakest opponent nor guess what they will try, prepare for your strongest adversary and all that they can do" -- mutatis mutandis, Sun Tzu, Art of War
Re: Brute.Fail: Watch brute force attacks fail in real time
#183I have an RDP server open to the internet(on a custom port) and it just receives an absolutely relentless stream of login attempts with all kinds of random logins. That's a private server on a private home IP, not associated with a known domain or anything. Changing the port stops it for about 24 hours then it starts again.
Why not VPN?
Re: Brute.Fail: Watch brute force attacks fail in real time
#184Is hiding the last octet of the IP address really enough privacy?
Re: Brute.Fail: Watch brute force attacks fail in real time
#185Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah, we have the same problem. I made a custom firewall rule and a python script that watches the windows logs for multiple failed logins to combat this and it seems to work pretty well but there's always new ips.
IPBan does that: https://github.com/DigitalRuby/IPBan
Re: Brute.Fail: Watch brute force attacks fail in real time
#186Earlier quoted context omitted.
Who still allows password-based login for any SSH account, root or not? Keys, certificates, or Kerberos for all users.
I do. For some reason ssh keys became the group-think security advice to repeat ad nauseam. I often find people have only considered this very shallowly, and their reasoning is just "But OMG, entropy lolz" without actually seriously considering the available entropy and likely attack vectors and failure. Why? The benefits are largely theoretical if you choose sufficiently strong randomly generated passphrases, with s…
A man in the middle attack where you accept the server key can steal your password, but it can’t your key.
Re: Brute.Fail: Watch brute force attacks fail in real time
#187I have an RDP server open to the internet(on a custom port) and it just receives an absolutely relentless stream of login attempts with all kinds of random logins. That's a private server on a private home IP, not associated with a known domain or anything. Changing the port stops it for about 24 hours then it starts again.
I know nothing about networking, so pardon the ignorance: Why isn't there (or is there) some kind of service you can use to map some crazy URL to your personalip:port, like... http://obscuremyshit.com/393nnasjhf83u98723401 = personalip:port And only when a connection is referred from that source, does the RDP server even expose itself? And for all other traffic that hits personalip:port, it does absolutely nothing?
Re: Brute.Fail: Watch brute force attacks fail in real time
#188Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because it doesn't solve any real problems if you have ssh password login disabled and filter out login failures from logs
With port knocking or a simple as having SSH on a non-standard port, the connection request stops before even opening the TCP connection. That's less load on the system, less logs, less writing to storage, etc. Less of what you don't want must surely be preferable.
Re: Brute.Fail: Watch brute force attacks fail in real time
#189I setup SSHD to listen on a wireguard interface rather than listening on all interfaces. This makes SSHD only accessible to wireguard peers rather than the entire internet. A nice aspect of wireguard is that it's "steath", meaning that it does not respond to unauthenticated connections at all, so there is no way to probe and scan for wireguard listeners at all. I think setting up daemons behind wireguard offers a lot…
maybe telnet over wireguard ? :)
Re: Brute.Fail: Watch brute force attacks fail in real time
#190Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because it doesn't solve any real problems if you have ssh password login disabled and filter out login failures from logs
With port knocking or a simple as having SSH on a non-standard port, the connection request stops before even opening the TCP connection. That's less load on the system, less logs, less writing to storage, etc. Less of what you don't want must surely be preferable.
btw TCP is cheap compared to public key crypto