Live data from Hacker News

Twitter Blue for $8/Month

twitter.com

181–190 of 1001 posts

Re: Twitter Blue for $8/Month

#182
It's funny how quickly the conversation has jumped from "Twitter will be a bastion of free speech" to "$8/mo is a fair price to pay for prioritizing your speech over others". Power to the people indeed.

Re: Twitter Blue for $8/Month

#183

The good: Twitter should not be editorally curating people through verification, making verification only about ID and being a real person is a broadly good change, as long as it's not necessary for participation. Brands, celebrities, those in the public eye could benefit from this. Needs to be implemented with care and ideally with a branding change so as not to confuse users as the semantics change. The bad: $8 is…

> See: every streaming service. Plenty of streaming services have ad-supported versions that are in this price range (e.g. Hulu, HBO Max). I don't disagree that having ads at all on Twitter Blue is bad, but I'm not sure the comparison with streaming services works.

[deleted]

Re: Twitter Blue for $8/Month

#187
post #43
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Netflix has ad-tier coming for $7/month. HBO Max costs like $16/month. I get ads for Hulu, but that costs only $.99/month on Black Friday deal. I'm paying $80/year for Disney, and I think Apple is still charging only $5/month. So....I don't know, $8 doesn't feel that ridiculously out of line priced. [1] https://www.ign.com/articles/netflix-ad-supported-tier-price...

Those companies all spend money to create and/or license content. Twitter seems to want users to pay $8/mo and continue to see ads for the privilege of creating the content that brings users to Twitter?

Apparently Twitter needs 20000 employees to let those users create the content; they need to get paid!

Re: Twitter Blue for $8/Month

#188

The price 100% was $20/mo as previously reported by journalists until Twitter dunked on it, and Elon's interpretation of the backlash is "the price is too high" and not "any price makes no sense at all." This pricing clarification is most likely due to Stephen King's complaint: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1587312517679878144 > We need to pay the bills somehow! Twitter cannot rely entirely on advertisers. How…

No, he just anchored everyone at $20 so that $8 comes across as affordable. Business 101.

Re: Twitter Blue for $8/Month

#189
post #180

Twitter is gonna crash and burn way sooner than I though.

That's what people said about Tesla.

I don't know which people you're referring to or why you are comparing a company that the Americans tax payers propped up for years to a social media website like Twitter.

Re: Twitter Blue for $8/Month

#190

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Exactly, thank you. I was going to say - $8/mo per US user would be a failing ad business.

YouTube is 13€ for ad-free and they're actually hosting videos (High bandwidth) AND share over 50% of this with the content creators. $8 is a lot - relatively speaking.

[deleted]
Post reply on HN