Live data from Hacker News

Removing SMS support from Signal Android (soon)

signal.org

181–190 of 649 posts

Re: Removing SMS support from Signal Android (soon)

#181

This is bizarre. If this were an in-depth announcement with a long and well-structured technical justification attached, I could understand. Though I suspect I'd likely disagree with the decision, I could probably accept it as a simple different of opinion if the arguments were evidently well-thought-through and considered. This blog-post is so lightweight. There's no technical analysis. There's barely any justificat…

[deleted]

Re: Removing SMS support from Signal Android (soon)

#182

I've been using Signal for a long time. I have repeatedly been unable to convince iOS users to use Signal because "I don't want another app". Android users have been much more willing to give it a shot. As an android user myself, I much prefer having SMS built in because I use the search feature often to look back through all my SMS/Signal chats. I also regularly forward an SMS message to a Signal user, or vice versa…

Yes, this is an idiotic decision that makes me question the decisions being made as a whole by Signal. Does anyone have recommendations for a good default SMS app on Android?

The provide a fairly clear rationale beyond the ideological concern: users don't know/see who is on SMS and who isn't, and are being hit with high fees, and they are concerned that users may believe they have privacy when they do not.

These are reasonable issues and concerns, so I don't follow why you would question all of the other decisions they make.

Re: Removing SMS support from Signal Android (soon)

#183
post #55

This is an awful decision. I've converted some friends and family to Signal over the past years (it took a while) and it is now their default messaging app on their phones. This is going to confuse them and is going to make it difficult for me to keep convincing them that Signal is the route to use. ("Why do I need 3 apps (Android Messages, Signal, Whatsapp) to talk to people?")

Signal seem to have adopted the "Decisions, not Options"[^1] route way too well, so don't act surprised. This is why we need at least open source clients that can be forked when these decisions are made. [^1]: https://wordpress.org/about/philosophy/

I have never understood why decisions and options have to be mutually exclusive. Yes, you want to have a rock-solid, thoughtfully-design default install for new and casual users. You can still have an advanced control panel with everything a power user could want.

Re: Removing SMS support from Signal Android (soon)

#184

This is an awful decision. I've converted some friends and family to Signal over the past years (it took a while) and it is now their default messaging app on their phones. This is going to confuse them and is going to make it difficult for me to keep convincing them that Signal is the route to use. ("Why do I need 3 apps (Android Messages, Signal, Whatsapp) to talk to people?")

Is this outcry US specific? Don't think I've sent a single SMS the last decade here in EU.

Re: Removing SMS support from Signal Android (soon)

#185
Absolutely not. Nobody wants to have to use a second app, especially after having it this way forever. Where's the change.org petetion?

I will be recommending against using Signal for any reason whatsoever to unless this decision changes. If it goes through, I'll move myself and everyone to something else. The options for e2e encryption are many today and I already have to have a bunch of these apps, so Signal becomes pointless. If they do this, they'll do worse later. Better to get out now at the "first" red flag.

Re: Removing SMS support from Signal Android (soon)

#187

One bright side of this is that Android's (Google's) Messages app has been pushing hard on RCS (the intended successor to SMS) and by default now does auto-upgrade to end-to-end encryption with any other messages users. If you're using signal, you don't get that auto-upgrade, so for conversations with anyone using a "default" google phone setup you were actually getting less net security on your comms compared to usi…

Does AOSP Messaging do RCS? I am assuming not.

No, AOSP Messages does not support RCS.

It seems Google is going to let it die to move people to Google Messages.

Re: Removing SMS support from Signal Android (soon)

#188
In addition to what everyone else here is saying (this is the most mind-bogglingly stupid idea you could imagine, which will instantly kill the adoption of Signal in the US) I want to point out that the purported reasons for removing this feature would be completely solved by hiding SMS behind a setting. If you want to be EVEN MORE paranoid you could periodically warn users if this setting is enabled, just like they periodically bug you about your pin. The only explanation I can have for this decision is that the real reasons for it have nothing to do with those given.

Re: Removing SMS support from Signal Android (soon)

#189

... and there's the reason I will likely stop using Signal? Signal was always one of those "win-win" apps, get more security when it's available and I don't have to worry about adding to the giant bucket of messaging apps. They were a paragon of putting the user first and I was a strong supporter... but now... Why not Telegram? Or anything else? I don't need the security, it was nice-to-have. Having to switch between…

> ... and there's the reason I will likely stop using Signal?

> Signal was always one of those "win-win" apps, get more security when it's available and I don't have to worry about adding to the giant bucket of messaging apps.

Same here. I see no reason to continue using Signal if they do this.

Re: Removing SMS support from Signal Android (soon)

#190

I get their reasoning that SMS is insecure and you don't want to accidentially send an SMS. I use Signal mostly for "confidential" things, but every now and then for the occasional person who contacts me there. So Signal is my "secure" app, Whatsapp my "family" app, and so on. It's really weird if a family member shows up in my secure activism chat app. It would make more sense if there was one codebase that supporte…

Beeper is working on it. We'll see how it turns out.

Matrix Bridges might also be a good option.

Post reply on HN