Live data from Hacker News

Proxy Chrome extensions are not going to be usable in MV3

bugs.chromium.org

181–190 of 215 posts

Re: Proxy Chrome extensions are not going to be usable in MV3

#181
post #4

As a proxy extension developer, this is absolutely maddening. We're forced to choose between auth-less open proxies (bad), or baking in a wacky authentication scheme through a side channel (also bad). MV3 drops in 2.5 months, and will leave tens of millions of proxy extension users unable to use products they paid money for. This is all on top of the many other issues with MV3 that Google is pushing under the guise o…

No post body was provided.

Re: Proxy Chrome extensions are not going to be usable in MV3

#182
post #156
post #2

Chromium team has not commented on this bug with 650+ stars (within top 10 https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?sort=-stars... issues) in months

Chromium team replied as of 10 minutes ago to that thread (thanks to HN exposure): "I'm temporarily restricting comments to keep comments from turning into +1s while this is trending on Hacker News. If you have additional thoughts that you'd like to share with the Chromium team regarding this issue, please return in a few days to leave a comment (and apologies for the inconvenience)." "As a Chromium contributor that…

So, they should also delay blocking of MV 2 if they aren't gonna give time to other developers. But nah, chromium team just wanted to block the comments so they don't get bad PR. Google is such a shame these days.

Re: Proxy Chrome extensions are not going to be usable in MV3

#183
post #4

As a proxy extension developer, this is absolutely maddening. We're forced to choose between auth-less open proxies (bad), or baking in a wacky authentication scheme through a side channel (also bad). MV3 drops in 2.5 months, and will leave tens of millions of proxy extension users unable to use products they paid money for. This is all on top of the many other issues with MV3 that Google is pushing under the guise o…

No post body was provided.

Re: Proxy Chrome extensions are not going to be usable in MV3

#184

It's telling that the last action from a google employee on the list was ... removing themselves from the notification list.

Don't worry these same chromium team will remove MV2 in name of security or performance. Modern software development by Google ...

Re: Proxy Chrome extensions are not going to be usable in MV3

#185
post #4

As a proxy extension developer, this is absolutely maddening. We're forced to choose between auth-less open proxies (bad), or baking in a wacky authentication scheme through a side channel (also bad). MV3 drops in 2.5 months, and will leave tens of millions of proxy extension users unable to use products they paid money for. This is all on top of the many other issues with MV3 that Google is pushing under the guise o…

No post body was provided.

Re: Proxy Chrome extensions are not going to be usable in MV3

#186
post #171

Earlier quoted context omitted.

that doesn't fix the problem, though.

Doesn't it? Product A is bad, thus use Product B. That's how most of my problems with different products are solved.

What if product B is also bad?

And there's also a product C, D, E but when you check them out you realize they are essentially clones of product A?

Re: Proxy Chrome extensions are not going to be usable in MV3

#187
post #25
post #4

As a proxy extension developer, this is absolutely maddening. We're forced to choose between auth-less open proxies (bad), or baking in a wacky authentication scheme through a side channel (also bad). MV3 drops in 2.5 months, and will leave tens of millions of proxy extension users unable to use products they paid money for. This is all on top of the many other issues with MV3 that Google is pushing under the guise o…

Have any of the Chromium forks committed to maintain MV2 into the future? Having functioning extensions while maintaining the other features that people like from the browser could help pull some marketshare from Google Chrome. Probably just dreaming though...

Vivaldi has previously promised to find an alternative for v3, but they left it in vague words and haven’t announced an update for this yet. https://vivaldi.com/blog/chromium-ad-blockers-choice/

Re: Proxy Chrome extensions are not going to be usable in MV3

#188
post #4

As a proxy extension developer, this is absolutely maddening. We're forced to choose between auth-less open proxies (bad), or baking in a wacky authentication scheme through a side channel (also bad). MV3 drops in 2.5 months, and will leave tens of millions of proxy extension users unable to use products they paid money for. This is all on top of the many other issues with MV3 that Google is pushing under the guise o…

Good old user:pass@ won't work?

Re: Proxy Chrome extensions are not going to be usable in MV3

#189

Once upon a time many years ago, Chrome was marginally better than Firefox. That time has long since passed. I know, I switched from Firefox to Chrome and used it for a couple of years, but Firefox got better and Chrome got worse, so I've been back on Firefox for many years again now. If Chrome doesn't do what you want or what you like, use Firefox. It does everything Chrome does, and more.

I miss this https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1682593

Re: Proxy Chrome extensions are not going to be usable in MV3

#190

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Firefox supports all DRM content I have come across, clearly there are ways to implement DRM that don't involve Google.

Depends on the browser and platform. WideVine support on Firefox for Linux is limited, one of the biggest effects of this is that some video platforms refuse to serve up high definition video to Firefox users on Linux. Netflix, for example, will only allow you to watch video at 720p on Firefox for Linux. The existing WideVine support comes directly from Google.

Chrome and Firefox on Windows is also limited to 720p so it's on par. https://help.netflix.com/en/node/23931
Post reply on HN