Live data from Hacker News

Including “And. And. And. And. And.” in a Google doc causes it to crash

support.google.com

181–190 of 441 posts

Re: Including “And. And. And. And. And.” in a Google doc causes it to crash

#181
post #167

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've found gender to be generally irrelevant to most of my social interactions. I'm, personally, in a committed relationship and not picky genderwise anyways so, as a habit, I've been trying to remove any and all gendered pronouns[1] from my speech. I find it pretty silly that gender plays so central a role in grammar. It, IMO, elevates it above how we should conceive of it - just one of many attributes a person has…

Quoted post unavailable.

"Someone came into this room. I don't know them, but they took it upon themselves to take everything."

What would be the correct pronouns here in your view?

Re: Including “And. And. And. And. And.” in a Google doc causes it to crash

#182
post #167

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've found gender to be generally irrelevant to most of my social interactions. I'm, personally, in a committed relationship and not picky genderwise anyways so, as a habit, I've been trying to remove any and all gendered pronouns[1] from my speech. I find it pretty silly that gender plays so central a role in grammar. It, IMO, elevates it above how we should conceive of it - just one of many attributes a person has…

Quoted post unavailable.

it's pretty common to use 'they' when gender is unknown or irrelevant

Re: Including “And. And. And. And. And.” in a Google doc causes it to crash

#183

Earlier quoted context omitted.

try /s at the end of "offending" sentence, most people will look at it more kindly.

I'm sure you're great. Nothing against you, but please don't do that. Just write what you mean if you can't handle some people misinterpreting a sarcastic remark. Let's think about this for a second. What's the point of sarcasm? If you have to tell people you're being sarcastic, are you still being sarcastic? Not sure what territory, "/s" blunders into, but I'm confident it's not sarcasm. It's something else that see…

Indicating sarcasm is not necessarily ruining it though. Look at IRL sarcasm, it will generally be accompanied with the right tone of voice and expression / body language that make its presence unequivocal. That doesn’t necessarily ruin it

Re: Including “And. And. And. And. And.” in a Google doc causes it to crash

#184
post #167

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've found gender to be generally irrelevant to most of my social interactions. I'm, personally, in a committed relationship and not picky genderwise anyways so, as a habit, I've been trying to remove any and all gendered pronouns[1] from my speech. I find it pretty silly that gender plays so central a role in grammar. It, IMO, elevates it above how we should conceive of it - just one of many attributes a person has…

Quoted post unavailable.

[deleted]

Re: Including “And. And. And. And. And.” in a Google doc causes it to crash

#185
post #172
post #114

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Rewritten for clarity (and because I now actually know what's happening): If you look at the XML (change .docx to .zip) in styles.xml you see the declaration of the style "BodyText3": The first line ("paragraph") has its style set to "BodyText3", but also has formatting on that section of text itself, overriding it. Once the lines are joined into one paragraph, the paragraph formatting appears in the second part beca…

Steps to reproduce: 1. Create a Word document (most likely using the Blank document template, Normal.dotm) 2. Type text of first line; press Enter; type text of second line (technically Word calls these 'paragraphs'--Shift+Enter inserts a newline within the same paragraph) 3. Place cursor on first paragraph 4. Click a Paragraph Style from the Styles ribbon section to apply it (e.g., the second one, No Spacing) 5. Rig…

Just to clarify, this is not how I created the original document in 2004 :-) There were certainly no paragraph styles involved, and the edit actions had to include an undo, or it wouldn't happen. There was also no style inspector yet.

Re: Including “And. And. And. And. And.” in a Google doc causes it to crash

#186
post #167

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've found gender to be generally irrelevant to most of my social interactions. I'm, personally, in a committed relationship and not picky genderwise anyways so, as a habit, I've been trying to remove any and all gendered pronouns[1] from my speech. I find it pretty silly that gender plays so central a role in grammar. It, IMO, elevates it above how we should conceive of it - just one of many attributes a person has…

Quoted post unavailable.

> "Themselves" is still a pronoun, and a plural one, at that.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/themselves, see "Can they, their, them, and themselves be used as singular pronouns?"

Re: Including “And. And. And. And. And.” in a Google doc causes it to crash

#187
post #162

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There wasn't a post-mortem in my case. I had thought of the case for but basically out of laziness talked myself out of writing a separate test case for it, presuming the test cases for a zero-length title and an un-closed title covered the corner cases. (The entire document was guaranteed to be converted to valid UTF-8, perhaps with invalid character substitution characters, by that late in the Content Converter pip…

Parent comment is onto something. You sound traumatized.

I was a couple years out of school, and felt a lot of responsibility. It wasn't really a big deal, but it didn't feel like it at the time.

Re: Including “And. And. And. And. And.” in a Google doc causes it to crash

#188
> Google Docs uses a "Markov Chain" to predict the next word for autocompletion purposes. In this case, of course, since we've already written "And" 5 times, the only logical next word would be "And", as showed in Djikstra's 1989 paper on the subject. Therefore, the Markov Chain never terminates and hence the memory chain overflows with infinite ands.

Does anyone know why this bug doesn’t repro for some words other than And if this is the case?

Re: Including “And. And. And. And. And.” in a Google doc causes it to crash

#189

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Quoted post unavailable.

"Someone came into this room. I don't know them, but they took it upon themselves to take everything." What would be the correct pronouns here in your view?

I'm suddenly very interested in the distinction here - as yea themself also works in both of these contexts but themselves feels like a very distinct connotation and not incorrect. I can't point to a specific grammatical rule or learning to base this feeling off though - I don't know why it feels correct it just does.

Re: Including “And. And. And. And. And.” in a Google doc causes it to crash

#190

> Google Docs uses a "Markov Chain" to predict the next word for autocompletion purposes. In this case, of course, since we've already written "And" 5 times, the only logical next word would be "And", as showed in Djikstra's 1989 paper on the subject. Therefore, the Markov Chain never terminates and hence the memory chain overflows with infinite ands. Does anyone know why this bug doesn’t repro for some words other t…

That statement follows with:

> Obviously, this is partly intentional- Gregory Markov modelled his famous Chain after his younger brother, who would try to finish all of Gregory's sentences for him. The one way Markov could fool him would be to repeat the same word multiple times, and then say "Jinx", also I made all of this up, good luck Google Docs team

Post reply on HN