Live data from Hacker News

Firefox Browser: best for a free web

mozilla.org

181–190 of 240 posts

Re: Firefox Browser: best for a free web

#181
post #71
post #59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Every time I use Firefox I find some other stupid issue that just doesn't fly in 2021. Today it might be a top 50 website that doesn't work properly, yesterday maybe it's excessive cpu usage, day before maybe pinch to zoom doesn't work. Who knows what dumb crap is happening tomorrow. Life is too short to muck around with half baked software.

Firefox is a dumpster fire half the time. I use Firefox still for exactly ONE website: Facebook. To keep it sandboxed. I still have to restart Firefox at least once every other day because it leaks and becomes a runaway process. No plugins/addons. As stock as it gets. One single website only... and it still pukes all over itself.

Are you even using an updated version?

Because I have firefox instances running for months with tremendous amounts of tabs open on 8GB of RAM laptop and has absolutely zero problem with it.

Re: Firefox Browser: best for a free web

#182
post #15
post #2

It makes me sad that FF browser share has continued to decline steadily. The past couple years of releases have been some its the best in terms of my own UX, since perhaps the Phoenix era. It's pretty fast these days, the UI is good, has a lot of great extensions and privacy features. I use Brave at work to have a better chrome-based experience with gsuite. It's also a fast, excellent browser with good privacy featur…

Just out of curiosity, what are some of Chrome's shady dealings? I'm not too informed on the subject.

Bundling Chrome with Flash and other software, such that it would install by default unless you uncheck the right checkbox (and make itself the default browser).

Making Google web applications (YouTube) use technologies only available in Chrome with much slower fallback used in other browsers.

Bundling Chrome with Android.

Ads pushing it aggressively on Google/YouTube. Ads IRL.

Re: Firefox Browser: best for a free web

#183

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Firefox seems to be the only hope to avoid a duopoly dominated by forces that are anti-privacy and anti-user. I recently made the move from Safari to Firefox and I am very pleased. This being said, I agree with you about the optics of Firefox management. There is a lot going on that isn't good and the personal enrichment of the executives feels all sorts of wrong. If FF management can not be good stewards of a vital…

Not really, since they never found a proper business model. So far, how do they make money? How do they pay the developers? How do they plan to be sustainable? Is there any place where I can see who donated them? Which share of donations is given by large companies that are constantly breaking the values the Mozilla foundation stands for? Was the news that Google will pay $400M per year to be the default search engin…

Do you use any open source software? Since most of it is made by people unable to sustain themselves from their projects.

Re: Firefox Browser: best for a free web

#184

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't care which core browser tech I use, so I'd take a trustworthy chrome fork that meets my other requirements. Unfortunately, Brave = untrustworthy player: https://brave.com/brave-ads/

> I don't care which core browser tech I use, Yeah, i do. > so I'd take a trustworthy chrome fork that meets my other requirements. Fair enough. > Unfortunately, Brave = untrustworthy player: https://brave.com/brave-ads/ Yeah, but i can compile that stuff out like i do with the mozilla crap, while still getting some of the core stuff they add like native ipfs support

Hate to break it to you, but in Brave's case you really can't. Their crypto and ad stuff is so ingrained in their codebase that you have to be pretty meticulous to wipe it all out on that level. https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/issues/14783

Re: Firefox Browser: best for a free web

#185

The fact alone that FF is the best-optimized browser for uBlock Origin makes it an easy choice for me. It's interesting to me that many of my favorite/most used web technologies in the past decade or so have come from individual, non-profit developers just trying to make something useful, free and flying in the face of a lot of legal and industry norms (e.g., gorhill, elbakyan). In my experience, these tend to work b…

Tor isn't built from FF, AFAIAA (TorBrowser is though).

Ah sorry - my mistake!

Re: Firefox Browser: best for a free web

#186
post #37

Mozilla charge money for Firefox. I’m tired of “free” software that sell my data and attention.

Here here! Are there any paid browsers out there? Or does Mozilla have any paid membership beyond "donate whatever you want"?

The worst part about donating to Mozilla is that donation is not used for Firefox development.

Re: Firefox Browser: best for a free web

#187
post #15
post #2

It makes me sad that FF browser share has continued to decline steadily. The past couple years of releases have been some its the best in terms of my own UX, since perhaps the Phoenix era. It's pretty fast these days, the UI is good, has a lot of great extensions and privacy features. I use Brave at work to have a better chrome-based experience with gsuite. It's also a fast, excellent browser with good privacy featur…

Just out of curiosity, what are some of Chrome's shady dealings? I'm not too informed on the subject.

Chrome prioritizes search suggestions over your history when you type in keywords in the address bar. I find this behavior very annoying since most of the time I perfectly know what website I want to visit. Obviously, Google will always have an incentive to take you to its search results page.

Firefox on the other hand prioritizes your browsing history by default (you can still change that in settings) which makes finding anything much faster and the whole experience much smoother. Plus you can easily limit the search to your history by preceding the keywords with ^, or to your bookmarks with *.

Re: Firefox Browser: best for a free web

#188

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I don't care which core browser tech I use, Yeah, i do. > so I'd take a trustworthy chrome fork that meets my other requirements. Fair enough. > Unfortunately, Brave = untrustworthy player: https://brave.com/brave-ads/ Yeah, but i can compile that stuff out like i do with the mozilla crap, while still getting some of the core stuff they add like native ipfs support

Hate to break it to you, but in Brave's case you really can't. Their crypto and ad stuff is so ingrained in their codebase that you have to be pretty meticulous to wipe it all out on that level. https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/issues/14783

Yeah, i still think it would be pretty doable (esp if just changing return values and commenting out stuff), esp with the amount of time I spent over the years modding/removing/adding stuff to my ff fork in both rust code and c++ code.

But I was mostly interested in the theoretical situation if brave forked from the servo stuff and not its existing chromium stuff, no interest in touching that.

Re: Firefox Browser: best for a free web

#189

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I still ask myself: has FF browser share actually dropped that much, or has FF's privacy focus caused browser share estimates to mostly miss FF users in their counts? Most of these stats come from the exact kind of skeevy companies that I (and many other FireFox users) are using FireFox to avoid.

My take on FF "decline" is that FF user share (%) dropped because the pie started expanding (especially on mobile). New internet users are likely to be Safari or Chrome users for whom the browser they have is good enough. And Firefox on mobile is simply not as fast as alternatives (the bar set by Chromium Android is very high), kinda painful to use unless you have a highend device, esp. JS heavy sites like Twitter wo…

Number of Firefox users is dropping, not just Firefox market share.

Re: Firefox Browser: best for a free web

#190

This is the same Firefox that said “deplatforming is not enough” Sorry Firefox, you’re not an arbiter of truth in my book.

You are complaining about Mozilla, not the open source product they make. Edit: I’m HN-wrong, best type

You are complaining about your house being torn down, not the motorway for which your house was torn down. No need to bring the motorway into this unrelated matter.
Post reply on HN