Live data from Hacker News

Matrix trailer dynamically uses current time

thechoiceisyours.whatisthematrix.com

181–190 of 198 posts

Re: Matrix trailer dynamically uses current time

#181
post #180

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sorry do you mean that not all b, g, etc. argument values are possible? So b1 g2 for example might be possible, but b2 g1 might not exist? i.e. are values truly random / uniformly distributed?

any combination is possible but, e.g., all blue videos with g3 will have same g segment.

Makes sense, thanks!

Re: Matrix trailer dynamically uses current time

#182

Earlier quoted context omitted.

(Further Matrix Online spoilers) The main storyline of the bulk of the time that The Matrix Online was, uh, online was the resurrection of Neo (or "the retrieval of Neo from the Source" if you prefer that nomenclature). Morpheus sacrificed himself as a part of that effort. From the stand point of "Morpheus sacrificed himself for Neo", that's a good story, even if very few players were around for the game event where…

If Matrix Online had an important part of the plot then Matrix 4 would include that story to catch everyone up.

I agree, but also the Wachowskis put important parts of the plot of Matrix 2 and 3 in the Animatrix animated anthology and also the videogame Enter the Matrix so this wouldn't be the first time for the franchise.

Re: Matrix trailer dynamically uses current time

#183
post #176
post #150

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm disappointed, would've been cool if it was done on the fly

Their static file approach makes sense. There's "only" 1440 combinations and the site is going to get a lot more views than that so why bother re-rendering everything dynamically?

Technically you wouldn't have to re-render (i.e. recompress), you could just dynamically splice in different compressed audio frames. AAC (what MP4 uses) does this well, MP3 less so but for vast majority of listeners it's still indiscernible, especially if there's a slight audio gap. The CPU load is de minimis, though you do still need to track frames--can't just move blobs from disk to socket using sendfile(2). I did this for a radio streaming server that supported per-listener ads--everybody received the same content stream (or at least, one of several codec+format pipelines, i.e. RTP+AAC, FLV+MP3, etc), but when ad spots were detected they were dynamically swapped with different spots that varied per output stream. From the perspective of downstream software clients it was still always one long, unbroken encoded stream. I never got around to supporting compressed video frame splicing, but it would work the same way, modulo the fact that your key frames tend to be spaced out more so it wouldn't always be so seamless with ad hoc content (you'd definitely want a brief screen blackout or carefully placed key frames for the transition like you often see in broadcast television).

But while conceptually easy to do this, I've never seen other streaming servers do this, certainly not open source ones. And of course the most obvious, simplest way is to just pre-render a bunch of static files and serve using a dumb HTTP server.

Re: Matrix trailer dynamically uses current time

#185

I am wondering why it thinks it is 8:24am when my computer says it is 9:24am ... Google is able to detect my time, why cant the matrix?

Its a ploy of matrix to keep you convinced it doesnt exist.

That matrix is a sly one, I guess it was the real redpill answer. Made me seriously doubt the nature of reality, time and space.

I was genuinely curious as to which time field it was picking up in my browser - I suspect it is ignoring daylight savings time offset? Got downvotes instead so wtf would I know!

Re: Matrix trailer dynamically uses current time

#188
post #87

Found a teaser (possibly testing one?) with WB Marketing watermarks: https://thechoiceisyours.whatisthematrix.com/_nuxt/videos/qu...

Good find! Unfortunately, the file has since disappeared..! Did you download it by any chance?

https://web.archive.org/web/20210907191313/https://thechoice...

Re: Matrix trailer dynamically uses current time

#189

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Good find! Unfortunately, the file has since disappeared..! Did you download it by any chance?

https://web.archive.org/web/20210907191313/https://thechoice...

Wow, good one. Thank you!

Few interesting things about that file:

- that video has a higher bitrate -- ffprobe shows 4338 kb/s, which is probably an average value. One of the "regular" MD5-named videos I tried has 2256 kb/s as its bitrate

- the resolution of the file is the same as the regular MD5-encoded filename videos i.e. 1080p

- as the https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28448361 comment mentions, it does have WB watermarks

- the Internet Archive grabbed 4 similarly non-MD5-named videos in total:

https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://thechoiceisyours.whati...

(I can't link to the list of files directly because the asterisk in the URL breaks HN formatting -- follow the "Click here to search for all archived pages under" link)

- The 7000k/12000k values in those URLs do correspond to bitrate. The 12000k video (downloadable from the archive.org link above) has an average bitrate of 6131 kb/s. It also has watermarks.

Re: Matrix trailer dynamically uses current time

#190
post #99
post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you want me to translate this from Hollywood BS? Hugo probably thinks it’s a stinkerrrr.

That's definitely a possibility. Hugo said he read and wanted to be part of it despite some initial reticence about going back to the franchise again.¹ I guess we'll see. I'm surely not betting on being as good as the first. ¹ https://www.gamespot.com/articles/matrix-4-hugo-weaving-spea...

I’ve heard an interview with the Dir. of Photography of Matrix 1/2/3 and he said the Wachowskis lost their way after 1, changed their entire way of dealing with actors (it shows) and he hated the experience. I wouldn’t be surprised if he wasn’t the only one.

Tbh my impression is there was some genius ghost writing done by one or multiple individuals on Matrix 1, which as per Hollywood rule, is never to be acknowledged (this happens all the time). The Wachowskis are now stuck in this weird loop of making films that are not as good as that one while having far more than enough opportunities to do it at this point.

Post reply on HN