Earlier quoted context omitted.
Capitalism is predicated on the idea of perpetual and infinite growth. Those assumptions are reflected in many ways and we're going to need to rethink our economy and political systems with entirely different assumptions soon enough because we're already running into their limits.
Growth means that things get better. If you build better houses and cars, that is growth. Likewise if you cure more cancers. Economic growth does not imply consuming more resources. Developing a more fuel efficient car is also growth, for example.
> Developing a more fuel efficient car is also growth, for example.
One of the major economic concerns about electric vehicles is that they have fewer moving parts and maintenance requirements, and might cut auto worker jobs in half.[1] I don't think the article got into numbers of job loss in gas stations, oil production and distribution, etc. So the most fuel efficient car possible may prove to be bad for growth in general.
> Economic growth does not imply consuming more resources.
Technically true, but in practice, if your product is not 100% recycled and 100% carbon negative to produce, you'll need to extract more of the earth to sell it.
I will say that with some industries like meat production potentially moving to vats and away from farmed animals, there is a possibility. But you also have to consider the economic damage of eliminating cattle farmers, farm vets, slaughterhouses, meat packing, etc.
[1] https://www.nbcnews.com/business/autos/electric-vehicles-pos...