Live data from Hacker News

Amazon US customers given one week to opt out of mass wireless sharing

theguardian.com

181–190 of 338 posts

Re: Amazon US customers given one week to opt out of mass wireless sharing

#181
post #118
post #78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's the same thing Apple is doing. They want every device to be a part of a low-power BLE network for Apple AirTags or Amazon Echo Tiles or whatever they are. They want a huge network so that these small low power devices can use everyones devices to connect to the internet. For what it's worth, the only way to Opt-Out from Apple's broad network like this is to disable all "Find My" network tracking, so you'll never…

The idea of a mesh network is not what concerns most people. It’s the idea that devices from Amazon connect to it automatically and can do whatever they want with it. The canonical anti-example is this: You buy a smart TV, but don’t give it your WiFi password. No problem, it connects to any Amazon device whether in your house or next door, and now it can sell information about what you watch, how many people its came…

> People fear that Amazon will use its mesh network to spy on you in the name of revenue.

Amazon's track record with privacy and security is much more Apple-esque than Google-esque

Re: Amazon US customers given one week to opt out of mass wireless sharing

#182
post #106

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can you give any insight into the solution you’re using to achieve this? I’ve got some noisy gadgets on my network that I want to cordon off, but I’m not sure where to begin.

You can place them in a separate VLAN for starters, and block traffic between anything other than the internet.

[deleted]

Re: Amazon US customers given one week to opt out of mass wireless sharing

#183

Question -- I'm assuming most ISPs have something in their terms that prohibit a customer from sharing the connection. So with Amazon inducing a violation of customer terms of service, I wonder if ISPs will go after the customers, or go directly after Amazon for triggering the violations?

If the traffic is tunnelled, then customers aren't really sharing their IP address, and undetectable at the network level. What remains is a purely legal question.

Re: Amazon US customers given one week to opt out of mass wireless sharing

#184
post #118
post #78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's the same thing Apple is doing. They want every device to be a part of a low-power BLE network for Apple AirTags or Amazon Echo Tiles or whatever they are. They want a huge network so that these small low power devices can use everyones devices to connect to the internet. For what it's worth, the only way to Opt-Out from Apple's broad network like this is to disable all "Find My" network tracking, so you'll never…

The idea of a mesh network is not what concerns most people. It’s the idea that devices from Amazon connect to it automatically and can do whatever they want with it. The canonical anti-example is this: You buy a smart TV, but don’t give it your WiFi password. No problem, it connects to any Amazon device whether in your house or next door, and now it can sell information about what you watch, how many people its came…

Amazon's Ad business is a monster that is growing faster and faster [1] so they'll want to track and absorb as much data as possible. FireTV is one of the noisiest devices in my home, second only to Roku, constantly phoning home.

Selling access to a mesh network to other providers will become an additional source of recurring revenue from what would have otherwise been one time revenue source (hardware sale).

It will be no different than Amazon competing w/ FedEx and UPS using it's delivery engine

[1] https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/29/amazons-ads-business-nears-7...

Re: Amazon US customers given one week to opt out of mass wireless sharing

#185
post #120

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As exchange for their otherwise unpaid service from those devices, they're using a fraction of your potentially capped internet if you happen to be in a market with such poor competition and/or poor regulatory environment that your service is capped.

So like 90% of the US?

The US is full of slow internet, but it's not particularly plagued by capped internet.

There are a bunch of 1TB caps around, but a cap like that would suggest that the value of 500MB is 3 to 10 cents at most.

Just using 3 watts at idle is already enough to cost the average person 25 cents a month.

Re: Amazon US customers given one week to opt out of mass wireless sharing

#187
post #7

What will happen is some high profile company that has a few Amazon devices on their network will have these devices exploited to gain network access and get hit with some ransomware/data theft/etc... and then there will be a big legal battle between Amazon and the hacked company and this whole idea will be shut down and consumers will get a $10 class action settlement for each device.

Maybe not? Most consumer arbitration agreements these days ban asserting class claims. This has been on the rise since 2011: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AT%26T_Mobility_LLC_v._Concepc... . In my opinion, this legal change is a huge sleeper story that is behind a number of changes in how customers are getting treated. Since customers can no longer economically avail themselves of the courts to protect themselves en-…

> Most consumer arbitration agreements these days ban asserting class claims.

This really ought to be illegal.

Re: Amazon US customers given one week to opt out of mass wireless sharing

#188

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> what problem does Amazon thinks this solves? Bad connectivity experiences for Ring users? I wrote my guess elsewhere in this thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27358758 tl;dr Amazon will resell access to Sidewalk to device manufacturers, allowing them to cost-effectively bridge the "telemetry gap".

100% this. as a device maker, sidewalk is a potential game changer for low power connectivity and finally a path to lorawan finding wide spread adoption

I don't like the idea of my neighbors piggybacking off my data and power hookups. Why aren't device manufactures figuring out how to make things that don't require something like sidewalk to exist?

It's not that difficult to run cable and use power over ethernet.

Re: Amazon US customers given one week to opt out of mass wireless sharing

#189

94.9% pure, organic, outrage, clickbait FUD. This feels like an "you're either with us or you're against us, Amazon B A D"-article. The central thesis is misleading and wrong because it's NOT "unlimited, direct sharing of your WiFi to whatever Amazon users happen to fall and scrape their knees outside your home because they can't skateboard," it's "likely low-rate connectivity for other Amazon users' devices over Blu…

The problem is that they're using my hardware, my internet connection and my electricity without paying me or asking for my permission.

Unless it takes significantly more power to do this, you definitely gave it permission to use your electricity.

Re: Amazon US customers given one week to opt out of mass wireless sharing

#190

Earlier quoted context omitted.

100% this. as a device maker, sidewalk is a potential game changer for low power connectivity and finally a path to lorawan finding wide spread adoption

except that, unlike ble, lora lives on bands that are not the same world wide - there is no region 3 ISM band - here in NZ the US ISM band is right in the middle of one of my cell phone company's bands

this is true but in practice it's not a big deal. Companies don't usually do a single sku for the whole world especially with the certification requirements.
Post reply on HN