Earlier quoted context omitted.
> If in fact the statement by dcurtis is the first efflorescence of the problem, your line of thinking would reject it anyway. This is true, but we have to take it in context. How likely is it that this is the policy, and we’ve never heard about it before now? The card has been our for a couple of years. Millions of people are using it. This implies 10s of millions of payments. At a conservative estimate this would m…
Thanks, and I agree with you. But policies can change, so it's a fair conversation to have if in fact the stated thing happened. People seem to think that "is there evidence for what you said" is some kind of abusive reply but that should be table stakes for most claims. The guy in the tweet already said he'd write something up, but the people who said he is probably stating falsehoods just came up with that based on…
Yes, but it’s a not a fair conversation to start by spreading a false statement.
If we’re just speculating about the policies, headlines like the one on this post are simply not true.
Right now, that may be exactly what has happened. We don’t know yet but we do know it’s not as simple as the tweet and headline claim.