Live data from Hacker News

The Now-Defunct Firms Behind 8chan, QAnon

krebsonsecurity.com

181–190 of 270 posts

Re: The Now-Defunct Firms Behind 8chan, QAnon

#181

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Second, it is very much out of the norms of HN to do email-style alternating quote/response the way you are. I've seen such used before (though with italics to help the eye find the breaks), when a comment makes too many points or is too complex to reply to without making it clear which part of the comment is relevant to which part of a reply. Is there a better way to format conversations on HN when comments reach th…

I really think the right way to do it is just to write a natural paragraph that refers to what the parent was saying. But what you did, with a single italicized reference at the top, is an HN idiom as well. A long back-and-forth of quote and rebuttal though is definitely not the style here. That style makes sense in Email and Usenet, because you're often using readers that don't show the parent comment at the same ti…

People can edit comments here. It makes no sense to permit the commenter to whom you are responding to recontextualize your words by editing their post after a response is received.

Anyway, there is nothing in the site guidelines defining "the style here," as you call it. Are you the sole repository of the style here, or are there others?

Re: The Now-Defunct Firms Behind 8chan, QAnon

#182
post #105

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think this line of thinking is absolutely correct when conspiracy theories are fringe or harmless. You don't believe we landed on the moon? Okay, buddy, have a nice day. Occasionally, though, conspiracy theorists escape the harmless fringe and become actively harmful to society, which is what many of us believe is happening in the USA today. A racist conspiracy theory that posited, contrary to all evidence, that ou…

It has also destoyed families. I know people whose parents have gone down the QAnon rabbit hole, and the outcome is absolutely insane. They can't have a 20 minute conversation without the vast pedophilic conspiracy in Washington intruding (Because the parents cannot understand why their children could possibly be acting in accord with it.) Another one of my friends can't even see his mother, because she doesn't belie…

> It's interesting to see how this is not a popular opinion to express here.

I've noticed that random comments which go against the shibboleths of the -- for lack of a better term -- 'orange man good' narrative can be subject to strange downvoting behavior.

Some of the posts that get hit by this, such as yours, are so innocuous that I'm not convinced that the targeting is organic as opposed the effects of some strongly opinionated s---head with a botnet and nothing better to do with his time.

Re: The Now-Defunct Firms Behind 8chan, QAnon

#183

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If I'm not mistaken the NZ killer was on 8chan? It's the same argument with serial killer movies (at the risk of showing my age there was a strong controversy with "Natural Born Killers" at the time): you don't kill people because you chatted on the internet or watched a movie. You kill people because you had it in you. The things you were exposed before might color your act but that's it.

> you don't kill people because you chatted on the internet or watched a movie. There is this pervasive idea lately a crazy youtube video or text can't actually be harmful, which just isn't true. Ideas can inspire wars, murder, revolution, they can warp minds. People previously productive can end up obsessed with crazy junk. It is important to protect each other and ourselves from bad ideas. The question is how, of c…

Could not disagree more.

Pure information is harmless, beliefs are not. Crazy beliefs emerge from the lack of critical thinking, not from the "dangerous information".

Therefore censorship is only good as part of "divide and conquer" strategy.

Re: The Now-Defunct Firms Behind 8chan, QAnon

#184
post #19

Man, I never cared much for QAnon, but the way so many mainstream institutions are joining together, using the exact same misleading talking points, to censor something off the internet makes me wonder if they're onto something after all.

It's amazing how skeptical people are of the idea of a paedophile ring among the elites when only recently Jeffrey Epstein was arrested for running one (and mysteriously died in custody).

It's pervasive in the French political elite.

They even wrote books praising the practice in the 1970s, before people started freaking out and they had to walk it back.

A former minister of education (and a philosophy professor, so not some random quack) said in a TV interview that a senior French politician was arrested in Morocco while having sex with children, except of course he could not name the actual culprit for legal reasons.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/may/31/former-french-...

Re: The Now-Defunct Firms Behind 8chan, QAnon

#185

I'll admit, I spent some time on 8chan both before and after jim Watkins took control. The story behind it all is actually pretty fascinating. One big thing I did notice though after a hiatus browsing there and going back. Watkins did something to that site. It was always pretty bad, a lot of the people there were pretty awful, but there wasn't an organized right wing presence pushing Nazi ideals and anti-Holocaust p…

Every place on the Internet that has free speech becomes nazi. Make of that what you want.

Re: The Now-Defunct Firms Behind 8chan, QAnon

#186
post #29

Of course everybody knows the right way to convince conspiracy theorists that they're wrong is to go after them. I don't see what's wrong with having internet trash bins. At least the trash is in a know location, it doesn't spill everywhere. I'm not from the US, the only mentions of those sites I have ever encountered was journalists making a few articles about them.

I sympathize with this view, but visit Reddit /r/qanoncasualties for a counterpoint. On one hand I am pretty close to a free speech maximalist. On the other hand, I do believe in the “fire in a crowded theater test.” I am starting to think that certain forms of public speech, namely that which harms large numbers of mentally ill people or has the potential to create a huge outburst of stochastic terrorism, may fail t…

I'm of the opinion that going after the places these people are known to congregate is a bad idea. It pushes them underground, and strengthens their bubble more than even Youtube's or Facebook's algorithms can accomplish. I agree that there is a problem here, but I don't think isolating them more is the solution.

My friend's wife went off the rails on the flat earth conspiracy. Thankfully, it's mostly benign as far as conspiracies go. She got in with a certain crowd and started cutting ties with those that gave her grief about it, or that she thought might. She knew the truth, the government was covering it up, etc. It was only through the actions of her husband, patiently bringing up questions and referring to science and hearing her out over a long period of time, that she came clean that she had finally come to the conclusion that she was wrong.

The quote about "sunlight being the best disinfectant" has some truth to it.

Re: The Now-Defunct Firms Behind 8chan, QAnon

#187

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The idea that we are “good in private” is a cultural statement. In fact, I’d have argued against it only a few months ago before I became aware that this is the norm for most of the world. In my world, all the dirty lies and secrets are kept private. We “put our best foot forward” and “manage our personal brand”. I think that this idea alone is worth discussing more, especially as it relates to justice. In my world,…

I assume 'your part of the world' is America. I can flip somebody the bird for obeying the speed limit and nobody calls cops with guns to stop me from being a shithead. I think it's generally true that people are more willing to be assholes to strangers than their close acquaintances. This has certainly been my observation of American culture at least. People are ruder to people the further removed from those people…

There is a longstanding acknowledgement of the "rude tourist" effect where people behave less respectfully when outside of their hometown, even if it's one town over. It just becomes more of a caricature when it's an entirely different language and culture and tourist is like, "well, that's not how we do things where I come from".

Re: The Now-Defunct Firms Behind 8chan, QAnon

#189

Of course everybody knows the right way to convince conspiracy theorists that they're wrong is to go after them. I don't see what's wrong with having internet trash bins. At least the trash is in a know location, it doesn't spill everywhere. I'm not from the US, the only mentions of those sites I have ever encountered was journalists making a few articles about them.

I think this line of thinking is absolutely correct when conspiracy theories are fringe or harmless. You don't believe we landed on the moon? Okay, buddy, have a nice day. Occasionally, though, conspiracy theorists escape the harmless fringe and become actively harmful to society, which is what many of us believe is happening in the USA today. A racist conspiracy theory that posited, contrary to all evidence, that ou…

"Contrary to all evidence" is not quite true. There were a couple of places where Obama was stated to have been born in Kenya:

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/promotional-booklet/

https://web.archive.org/web/20091020224623/http://www.npr.or...

I think the preponderance of evidence shows that he was born in Hawaii, but it's not "racist" or a "conspiracy theory" just to ask questions about it. It's more disturbing, IMO, to be a "status quo theorist" and refuse to even entertain one idea or another.

Re: The Now-Defunct Firms Behind 8chan, QAnon

#190

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If Jeffery Epstein hadn't received preferential treatment when he was convicted in 2008, I think few would remember him today (much less harbor so many suspicions about what politicians may have been involved with him.) The Epstein saga, I think, is providing the most fuel for the fire right now. Just yesterday Ghislaine Maxwell's 2016 deposition was unsealed, and it mentions Clinton and Prince Andrew, among others…

Did you mean to link to another PDF? There's only one page of deposition in that file and it doesn't name any Epstein clients. It's just a bit of back-and-forth between the plaintiff's attorney and the defendant's attorney.

The unsealed depositions from yesterday, as well as future unsealed documents can be found on courtlistener[1]. The new ones were released on the 22 of October.

Judge Peska gave Does 1 & 2 two weeks before they depositions are also unsealed (conveniently November 4th).

1. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4355835/giuffre-v-maxwe...

Post reply on HN