Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ya, I can see the connection. If that's true, it's quite interesting, I'm not sure if that makes him seem better or worse. The similarity I'd say is that I'm also emotionally detached from the situation (but intellectually attached - I perceive most people to have the opposite combo, fwiw). Differences I see are that I have no influence in the matter, and I have largely the opposite goals of Hitler. My favorite relev…
I don't know how old you are, but I'm old enough to remember when the Berlin Wall fell. I'm sure you remember 2019, when it seemed impossible that international travel would essentially shut down. The seeming inevitable isn't. Things change. > this is starting to look like it's going to be just one of those very unfortunate facts of life The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.
Sometimes some things change, sometimes they don't. It depends how you look at it. For example: there is change, and then there is rate of change. The latter typically doesn't get a lot of attention.
I wonder how the Uighurs look at it, or the millions of downtrodden and disenfranchised people now and throughout history - differently than IT folks like you and I who have the luxury of waxing philosophical about such things.
> The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.
I would say that this is both profoundly true, but also little more than a catchy slogan to reinforce the egos of people who think they are good.